University of Houston Law Center Logo
HOME
Faculty

20th Anniversary Logo Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law

 

FALL LECTURE

SPONSORED BY

Jorge L. Contreras
Professor of Law
University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law

Jorge L. Contreras

Professor of Law
University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law


Click here for Professor Contreras’ faculty listing

Wednesday evening virtual event, November 4, 2020

Starting at 6 p.m. (Houston time) with Professor Vetter’s opening remarks, the formal event will end at 7 p.m.

The virtual meeting will remain open for another 30 minutes, until 7:30 p.m. for a virtual meet & greet.  Details for the virtual meeting will be sent to those who RSVP.

To RSVP or for further information, contact
ipil@uh.edu or 713.743.2180
One Hour of CLE Credit

Anatomy of an Intellectual Property Movement:
The Open COVID Pledge

Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, ten scientists, engineers and lawyers in the U.S. and UK created a legal platform for sharing patent and copyright rights in response to the pandemic.  Their goal was to help overcome bottlenecks in the development, manufacture and distribution of COVID-critical technologies. The resulting Open COVID Pledge (opencovidpledge.org) went live in April, 2020, and has attracted pledges from a number of large technology companies including Intel, IBM, Microsoft, Amazon, Uber, AT&T and Facebook as well as two national laboratories and several small companies.  The organizers estimated that within a few months, more than 250,000 patents and other IP rights were pledged to the cause.  Yet notably absent from this effort were any biotechnology or pharmaceutical firms or major universities conducting biomedical research.  This lecture will describe the genesis, design and implementation of the Open COVID Pledge, placing it within the larger context of intellectually property rights sharing movements in the software, environmental and health areas.  This includes assessing the successes and potential shortcomings of the Open COVID Pledge given its role in the broader fight against COVID-19 and its potential as a model for sharing IPR in response to future crises.

PRIOR LECTURERS

JORGE L. CONTRERAS2020 JORGE L. CONTRERAS, University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law
Anatomy of an Intellectual Property Movement: The Open COVID Pledge

  2018 TIMOTHY R. HOLBROOK, Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs, Emory University; Asa Griggs Candler Professor of Law, Emory University School of Law
3D Printing, Digital Patent Infringement, and Its Implications2019 SARAH BURSTEIN, University of Oklahoma College of Law
Toward a Normative Theory of Design Patents

  2018 TIMOTHY R. HOLBROOK, Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs, Emory University; Asa Griggs Candler Professor of Law, Emory University School of Law
3D Printing, Digital Patent Infringement, and Its Implications2018 TIMOTHY R. HOLBROOK, Emory University School of Law
3D Printing, Digital Patent Infringement, and Its Implications

 2017 JOHN R. THOMAS, Georgetown University Law Center
The End of Patent Medicines? Exploring the Rise of Regulatory Exclusivities

Daniel Chow2016 DANIEL C.K. CHOW, The Ohio State University - Moritz College of Law
Trademark Squatting in China

RUTH OKEDIJI2015 RUTH OKEDIJI, University of Minnesota Law School
Inventing Intellectual Property: Source Disclosure for Genetic Patent Rights?

Dennis D. Crouch2014 DENNIS D. CROUCH, University of Missouri School of Law
Clarifying Patent Scope

Elizabeth A. Rowe2013 ELIZABETH A. ROWE, Levin College of Law, University of Florida
Intellectual Property and Information Control

The Honorable Jimmie V. Reyna2012 THE HONORABLE JIMMIE V. REYNA, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: Immediate and Future Challenges

Robert Brauneis 2011 ROBERT BRAUNEIS, George Washington University Law School
Trademark Infringement, Dilution, and the Decline in Sharing of Famous Brand Names

Jane Winn 2010 JANE K. WINN, University of Washington School of Law
Information Security as a Governance Challenge

Gregory N. Mandel2009 GREGORY N. MANDEL, Temple University Beasley School of Law
Patently Nonobvious: The Impact of Hindsight Bias on Patent Decisions

Bagley2008 MARGO A. BAGLEY, University of Virginia School of Law
Illegal, Immoral, Unethical… Patentable? Issues in the Early Lives of Inventions

Clarisa Long2007 CLARISA LONG, Columbia University School of Law
The Political Economy of Intellectual Property Law

John Duffy2006 JOHN F. DUFFY, George Washington University Law School, Washington, D.C.
The Invention of Invention: A History of Nonobviousness

Dan Burk2005 DAN L. BURK, University of Minnesota Law School, Minneapolis
The Problem of Process in Biotechnology

David Franklyn2004 DAVID J. FRANKLYN, University of San Francisco School of Law
The Anti-Free Rider Principle in American Trademark Law

2003 WILLIAM F. LEE, Hale & Dorr LLP, Bosto2003 WILLIAM F. LEE, Hale & Dorr LLP, Boston
Attorney-Client Privilege and Willful Infringement

HON. PAUL MICHE2002 HON. PAUL MICHEL, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Washington, D.C.
Predicting the Scope of Patent Protection: Construing Literal Claim Scope and Determining Available Equivalents

2001 YSOLDE GENDREAU2001 YSOLDE GENDREAU, Université de Montreal, Quebec
The Exportation of Copyright Models: The Retransmission Right and the Internet

2000 JERRE B. SWANN2000 JERRE B. SWANN, Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, Atlanta
Trademark Dilution for the Year 2000

1999 JOSEPH STRAUS1999 JOSEPH STRAUS, Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Patent, Copyright and Competition Law, Munich
Multinational Patent Enforcement: Problems and Solutions

1998 JOHN R. THOMAS1998 JOHN R. THOMAS, George Washington University Law School, Washington, D.C.
Transnational Patent Litigation

1997 HON. NANCY LINCK1997 HON. NANCY LINCK, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, D.C.
Patent Prosecution for the New Millennium

GLENN ARCHER



1996 CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE GLENN ARCHER, CIRCUIT JUDGE PAULINE NEWMAN, AND SENIOR CIRCUIT JUDGE EDWARD SMITH, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Washington, D.C.
Perspectives on Patent Law from Three Federal Circuit Judges

DONALD S. CHISUM1995 DONALD S. CHISUM, CHISUM ON PATENTS
The Allocation of Decisional Responsibility Between Judge and Jury in Patent Trials

JOHN PEGRAM1994 JOHN PEGRAM, Davis, Hoxie, Faithfull & Hapgood LLP
Complexity and Cost in Patent Litigation