Page 187 - The First Fifty Years

Do Not Delete 1/8/2015 10:16 AM

ENDURINGLY GREAT 181

21. Joyce, Driven, supra, at 14. Examples of HLRe’s content since its inception include
an article instructing young lawyers on the keys to professional success, a local appellate
expert opining on Texas arbitration law, and a spotlight on Judge Gray Miller. Patricia Hunt
Holmes, Susan M. Sorensen & Donald L. Kyle, Even Employees Are Self-Employed—Success as
a Professional Takes More Than Professional Ability, 3 HLRe 20 (2012); Cameron Pope, Texas
Arbitration Law: More Choices—and More Risk—Than Ever, 2 HLRe 1 (2012); Emily
Buchanan, Spotlight on Judge Gray H. Miller, 1 HLRe 1 (2010).

22. See Joyce & Hoffman, Leap, supra, at 119–22.

23. David B. Wilkins, Doing Well by Doing Good? The Role of Public Service in the
Careers of Black Corporate Lawyers, 41 HOUS. L. REV. 1 (2004).

24. Dorothy A. Brown, Taking Grutter Seriously: Getting Beyond the Numbers, 43
HOUS. L. REV. 1 (2006); Evan Caminker, Post-Admissions, Educational Programming in a
Post-Grutter World: A Response to Professor Brown, 43 HOUS. L. REV. 37 (2006); Carla D.
Pratt, Taking Diversity Seriously: Affirmative Action and the Democratic Role of Law
Schools: A Response to Professor Brown, 43 HOUS. L. REV. 55 (2006).

25. IPIL contributing authors (introductory and prologue material excluded)
throughout Decade 5 are listed chronologically below:

41:3 – Graeme B. Dinwoodie (Chicago-Kent); Stacey L. Dogan (Northeastern); A.
Michael Froomkin (Miami); William M. Landes (Chicago); Mark A. Lemley
(Stanford); J. Thomas McCarthy (San Francisco)

42:4 – Judge Frank H. Easterbrook (7th Circuit); Clayton P. Gillette (NYU);
Robert W. Gomulkiewicz (Washington); Robert L. Oakley (Georgetown); R. Polk
Wagner (Penn)

44:4 – Keith Aoki (UC Davis); Thomas F. Cotter (Minnesota); Robert Rosenthal
Kwall (DePaul); Peter S. Menell (UC Berkeley); Neil Weinstock Netanel (UCLA)

45:4 – Donald S. Chisum (Chisum on Patents); Rebecca S. Eisenberg (Michigan);
Paul J. Heald (Georgia); Janice M. Mueller (Pittsburgh); Michael J. Meurer
(Boston University); Arti K. Rai (Duke)

46:4 – Graeme B. Dinwoodie (Oxford); Rochelle C. Dreyfuss (NYU); Cynthia M.
Ho (Chicago); Charles R. McManis (Washington University); Jerome H.
Reichman (Duke); Peter K. Yu (Drake)

47:4 – Oren Bracha (Texas); Ronan Deazley (Glasgow); David Nimmer (UCLA);
Catherine Seville (Cambridge); Diane Leenheer Zimmerman (NYU)

48:4 – Ann Bartow (Pace); Barton Beebe (NYU); Greg Lastowka (Rutgers); Mark
McKenna (Notre Dame); Rebecca Tushnet (Georgetown)

50:2 – Colleen V. Chien (Santa Clara); Kevin Emerson Collins (Washington
University); Paul M. Janicke (Houston); Mark R. Patterson (Fordham); Lee
Petherbridge (Loyola L.A.); David L. Schwartz (Chicago-Kent); Katherine J.
Strandburg (NYU)

26. J. Thomas McCarthy, Proving a Trademark Has Been Diluted: Theories or
Facts?, 41 HOUS. L. REV. 713 (2004); Frank Easterbrook, Contract and Copyright, 42
HOUS. L. REV. 953 (2005); Graeme B. Dinwoodie, Trademarks and Territory: Detaching
Trademark Law from the Nation-State, 41 HOUS. L. REV. 885 (2004); Graeme B.
Dinwoodie & Rochelle C. Dreyfuss, Designing a Global Intellectual Property System
Responsive to Change: The WTO, WIPO, and Beyond, 46 HOUS. L. REV. 1187 (2009); David
Nimmer, Queen Anne in the Emperor’s Shadow, 47 HOUS. L. REV. 919 (2010).

27. Arti K. Rai, Building a Better Innovation System: Combining Facially Neutral
Patent Standards with Therapeutics Regulation, 45 HOUS. L. REV. 1037 (2008); Rebecca S.
Eisenberg, Noncompliance, Nonenforcement, Nonproblem? Rethinking the Anticommons
in Biomedical Research, 45 HOUS. L. REV. 1059 (2008); Janice M. Mueller & Donald S.
Chisum, Enabling Patent Law’s Inherent Anticipation Doctrine, 45 HOUS. L. REV. 1101
(2008); Paul J. Heald, Optimal Remedies for Patent Infringement: A Transactional Model,
45 HOUS. L. REV. 1165 (2008); Michael J. Meurer, Inventors, Entrepreneurs, and
Intellectual Property Law, 45 HOUS. L. REV. 1201 (2008).

28. United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 245 (1995).