Challenges to DACA program, direct or collateral:
Arpaio v. Obama, 27 F. Supp. 3d (D.D.C. 2014) (striking down AZ sheriff challenge to DACA)
United States v. Juarez-Escobar, 25 F. Supp. 3d 774 (W.D. Pa. 2014) [Memorandum Opinion and Order of Court Re: Applicability of President Obama’s November 20, 2014 Executive Action on Immigration to this Defendant]
Texas v. United States, No. 1:14-cv-00254 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 3, 2014) (states challenge DACA constitutionality)
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 20 F. Supp. 3d 260 (D.D.C. 2014) (Court upholds FOIA Exemption 5 withholding of privileged DACA deliberative memos).
Crane v. Napolitano, 920 F. Supp. 2d 724 (N. D. Tex. 2013) (challenge to DACA dismissed under Civil Service Reform Act (“CSRA”)); on appeal to Fifth Circuit.
Common Cause v. Biden, 909 F. Supp. 2d 9 (D.D.C. 2012) (dismissing Senate debate/filibuster rules, re immigration reform).
Challenges to benefit/status denial re USC children of undocumented parents:
Herrera v. Finan, No. 7:14-cv-02255-BHH (D.S.C. filed June 10, 2014) (resident tuition and financial aid case concerning USC children and undocumented parents).
Ruiz v. Robinson, 892 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (S.D. Fla. 2012) (FL resident tuition case concerning USC children and undocumented parents).
A.Z. ex rel. B.Z. v. Higher Educ. Student Assistance Auth., 48 A.3d 1151 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2012) (NJ financial aid case concerning USC children and undocumented parents); consolidated with:
Cortes v. Higher Educ. Student Assistance Auth., No. A-2142-11-T1 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2012).
Consent Decree, Student Advocates for Higher Educ. v. Bd. of Trs. of Cal. State Univ., No. CPF-06-506755 (Cal. Super. Ct. Apr. 19, 2007) (consent decree allowing aid to USC children of undocumented parents)
Immigration-related challenges to financial aid/residency:
Montana Immigrant Justice Alliance v. Bullock, No. BDV-2012-1042, 2014 WL 2881802 (Mont. Dist. Ct. June 20, 2014) (Order on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment, striking down restrictionist state law regarding resident tuition)
Mashiri v. Dep’t of Educ., 709 F.3d 1299 (9th Cir. 2013) (Stafford Loan eligibility)
Tobin v. Rea, 291 P.3d 983 (Ariz. 2013) (upholding challenge to Legislative Council's analysis of Prop. 204 [resident tuition bill] and ordering revisions to published analysis)
Hispanic Interest Coal. of Alabama v. Governor of Alabama, 691 F. 3d 1236 (11th Cir. 2012), cert den. Alabama v. U.S., 133 S. Ct. 2022 (2013), Scalia diss. (Ala. Code § 31-13-27) striking down residency statute regarding refugees)
Dismissal Order and Stipulated Permanent Injunction, Hispanic Interest Coal. of Alabama v. Bentley, No. 5:11-cv-2484-SLB (N.D. Ala. Nov. 25, 2013).
Marderosian v. Topinka, No. 1:12-cv-2262 (N.D. Ill. June 19, 2012) (challenge to Illinois in-state tuition law for undocumented students) [withdrawn, re-filed as Ardash Marderosian Trust v. Quinn, No. 1:12-cv-06869, 2013 WL 5405705 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 25, 2013) (challenge to Illinois scholarship law for undocumented student scholarship fund, including scholarship funded by original gift)]
Complaint for Declaratory Relief, Orellana v. State Council of Higher Educ. for Virginia, No. CL13003086-00 (Va. Cir. Ct. Dec. 17, 2013) (seeking to have DACA recipients considered eligible for resident tuition, unopposed motion for nonsuit granted Feb. 12, 2014)
DACA Beneficiary Georgia Coll. Students v. Univ. Sys. of Georgia’s Bd. of Regents, No. 14-cv-243077(Ga. Super. Ct. Fulton Cnty. Feb. 28, 2014), appeal filed, No. A14A2352 (Ga. Ct. App. Aug. 15, 2014).
Martinez v. Regents of the Univ. of California, 241 P.3d 855 (Cal. 2010), cert. den. 131 S.Ct. 2961 (June 6, 2011) (upholding CA resident tuition policy for undocumented students).
Complaint for Declarative and Injunctive Relief, Arizona v. Maricopa Cnty. Cmty. Coll. Dist. Governing Bd. (“MCCCD”) No. CV-13-9093 (Ariz. Super. Ct. June 25, 2013) (MCCCD challenge by state on resident tuition policy for DACA students).
Doe v. Maryland State Bd. of Elections, No. O2-C11-163050 (Md. Cir. Ct. Feb. 17, 2012) (unsuccessful challenge to the state ballot measure “freezing” the 2011 Maryland Dream Act implementation), affirmed on appeal, Doe v. Maryland State Bd. of Elections, 53 A.3d 1111 (Md. 2012).
Immigration Reform Coal. of Texas (IRCOT) v. Texas, 706 F. Supp. 2d 760 (S.D. Tex. 2010) (removed to state court); re-filed as Lone Star Coll. Sys. v. Immigration Reform Coal. of Texas (IRCOT), 418 S.W.3d 263 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2013) (standing and procedural issues). Lone Star College System and Richard Carpenter v. Immigration Reform Coalition of Texas (IRCOT), No. 14-0031 (Tex. Oct. 24, 2014) (Supreme Court of Texas denied petition for review; Motion to Re-Urge Intervention and Motion to File Brief dismissed as moot).
Opinion and Order, Philips v. Bd. of Trustees of Montgomery Coll., No. C-342882 (Md. Cir. Ct. Aug. 16, 2011) (dismissing challenge to Montgomery College tuition policy for undocumented in-district residents).
Order of Dismissal, Mannschreck v. Clare, No. Ci 10-8 (Neb. Dist. Ct. Dec. 17, 2010) (striking down challenge to Nebraska residency statute).
Notice of Withdrawal, Dominguez v. Texas, No. 5:07-cv-00549 (W.D. Tex. Nov. 6, 2008) (settlement agreement with notice of withdrawal regarding TX veterans college benefit).
Day v. Sebelius, 376 F. Supp. 2d 1022 (D. Kansas, 2005); Day v. Bond, 500 F. 3d 1127 (10th Cir. 2007) (dismissing challenge to Kansas state residency requirement).
Equal Access Education v. Merten, 325 F. Supp. 2d 655 (2004) (state need not enact state law to offer resident tuition for undocumented students).
DACA challenges to drivers’ license policies:
Arizona Dream Act Coal. v. Brewer, 757 F.3d 1053 (9th Cir. 2014), aff’d on remand, No. CV12-02546 PHX, 2015 WL 300376 (D. Ariz. Jan. 22, 2015) (Arizona drivers’ license ban in Arizona; defendants permanently enjoined from enforcing any policy or practice by which the Arizona Department of Transportation refuses to accept Employment Authorization Documents, issued under DACA, as proof that the document holders are authorized under federal law to be present in the United States for purposes of obtaining a driver's license or state identification card).
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice, One Michigan v. Johnson, No. 2:12-cv-15551 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 19, 2012) (challenge to Michigan policy of denying driver's licenses to DACA recipients (dismissed after Michigan reversed policy).
Complaint and Petition for Declaratory Judgment, Hernandez v. Heineman, No. CI-13-2124 (Neb. Dist. Ct. June 10, 2013) (challenge to Nebraska policy of denying driver's licenses to DACA recipients), remanded to district court, No. 4:14CV3178, 2014 WL 7331928 (D. Neb. Dec. 19, 2014).
Occupational Licensing/Bar admissions, DACA or undocumented:
In re Sergio Garcia on Admission, 315 P.3d 117 (Cal. 2014) (recognizing CA statute to admit undocumented applicant to CA bar).
In re Florida Bd. of Bar Examiners, No. SC11–256, 2014 WL 866065 (Fla. Mar. 6, 2014) (not admitting DACA applicant to FL bar).
Cesar Vargas, No. ___________ (N.Y. App. Div. 2014).
Juarez v. Nw. Mut. Life Ins. Co., Inc., 14-CV-5107 KBF, 2014 WL 6363919 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 14, 2014) (refusal to recognize EAD for hiring)
8 U.S.C. § 1621
Federal Cases Citing 8 U.S.C. § 1621 |
Case |
Type of Case/Benefit at Issue |
Depth of Discussion |
|
Maine Mun. Ass'n v. Mayhew, No. 1:14-CV-00311-JAW, 2014 WL 6879834 (D. Me. Dec. 4, 2014) |
General assistance benefits |
Discussed |
|
Utah Coal. of La Raza v. Herbert, 2:11-CV-401 CW, 2014 WL 2765195 (D. Utah June 18, 2014). |
State immigration reform statute |
Cited |
|
Korab v. Fink, 748 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 2014). |
State health benefits |
Cited in concurring opinion |
|
Villas at Parkside Partners v. City of Farmers Branch, Tex., 701 F. Supp. 2d 835, 841 (N.D. Tex. 2010) aff'd, 675 F.3d 802 (5th Cir. 2012) on reh'g en banc, 726 F.3d 524 (5th Cir. 2013) and aff'd, 726 F.3d 524 (5th Cir. 2013). |
Housing ordinance |
Discussed |
|
Villas at Parkside Partners v. City of Farmers Branch, Tex., 675 F.3d 802 (5th Cir.) reh'g en banc granted sub nom. Villas at Parkside Partners v. City of Farmers Branch, Texas, 688 F.3d 801 (5th Cir. 2012) and on reh'g en banc, 726 F.3d 524 (5th Cir. 2013) cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 1491 (2014). |
Housing ordinance |
Cited |
|
Villas at Parkside Partners v. City of Farmers Branch, Tex., 726 F.3d 524 (5th Cir. 2013) cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 1491 (U.S. 2014). |
Housing ordinance |
Discussed |
|
Kalincheva v. Neubarth, 13-CV-789-MMA WVG, 2013 WL 1499028 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 10, 2013). |
Fraud- unrelated to statute. |
Cited |
|
United States v. Alabama, 691 F.3d 1269, 1300 (11th Cir. 2012) cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 2022 (U.S. 2013). |
Business, commercial, and occupational licenses. |
Discussed- decision turns on analysis. |
|
Whittington v. U.S. Bank Nat. Ass'n, 4:12-CV-03167-MGL, 2013 WL 2285943 (D.S.C. May 23, 2013). |
Fraud- unrelated to statute. |
Mention in unrelated case |
|
Bruns v. Mayhew, 750 F.3d 61 (1st Cir. 2014). |
State health benefits |
Cited |
|
Pimentel v. Dreyfus, 670 F.3d 1096 (9th Cir. 2012). |
Public assistance (SNAP benefits) |
Cited |
|
Sanchez v. Hall, No. 5:10-CT-3027-D, 2011 WL 6369821 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 19, 2011). |
Education benefits (community college enrollment) |
Discussed |
|
Cent. Alabama Fair Hous. Ctr. v. Magee, 835 F. Supp. 2d 1165 (M.D. Ala. 2011) vacated sub nom. Cent. Alabama Fair Hous. Ctr. v. Comm'r, Alabama Dep't of Revenue, No. 11-16114-CC, 2013 WL 2372302 (11th Cir. May 17, 2013). |
Housing ordinance (registration of manufactured homes) |
Discussed (only in trial court opinion). |
|
United States v. Arizona, 641 F.3d 339 (9th Cir. 2011) aff'd in part, rev'd in part and remanded, 132 S. Ct. 2492 (2012). |
State immigration reform statute |
Discussed |
|
Korab v. Koller, No. CIV. 10-00483 JMS, 2010 WL 4688824 (D. Haw. Nov. 10, 2010). |
State health benefits |
Discussed |
|
In re B. Del C.S.B., 559 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2009). |
Custody proceedings |
Cited |
|
McPherson v. McCabe, No. 5:04-CT-990-FL, 2007 WL 4246582 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 2007) aff'd, 241 F. App'x 963 (4th Cir. 2007). |
Education benefits |
Discussed |
|
Shah v. Chertoff, No. 3:05CV 1608 BH(K)ECF, 2006 WL 2859375 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 5, 2006). |
Visa denial/ request for extension |
Cited |
|
Zhu v. I.N.S., 300 F. Supp. 2d 77 (D.D.C. 2004). |
Visa denial |
Cited |
|
United States v. Esparza-Mendoza, 265 F. Supp. 2d 1254 (D. Utah 2003) aff'd, 386 F.3d 953 (10th Cir. 2004). |
4th amendment protection for previously deported felon |
Cited |
State Cases Citing 8 U.S.C. 1621: |
|
Type of Case/Benefit at Issue |
|
|
Bamba v. Minnesota Dep't of Human Servs., No. A13-1717, 2014 WL 1758370 (Minn. Ct. App. May 5, 2014). |
State health benefits |
Discussed |
|
Florida Bd. of Bar Examiners re Question as to Whether Undocumented Immigrants are Eligible for Admission to The Florida Bar, 134 So. 3d 432 (Fla. 2014). |
Occupational license |
Discussed- Decision turns on analysis. |
|
Kaider v. Hamos, 975 N.E.2d 667 (Ill. App. Ct.) appeal denied, 981 N.E.2d 997 (Ill. 2012). |
Health benefits |
Discussed- Decision turns on analysis. |
|
Thomas v. Henry, 260 P.3d 1251 (Okla. 2011). |
Resident tuition |
Cited |
|
Philips v. Bd. of Trustees of Montgomery Coll., No. C-342882 (Md. Cir. Ct. Aug. 16, 2011). |
Resident tuition |
Discussed |
|
Finch v. Commonwealth Health Ins. Connector Auth., 459 Mass. 655 (2011). |
Health benefits |
Cited |
|
Hong Pham v. Starkowski, 300 Conn. 412 (2011). |
Health benefits |
Cited |
|
Hong Pham v. Starkowski, No. HHDCV095034410S, 2009 WL 5698062 (Conn. Super. Ct. Dec. 18, 2009) rev'd, 300 Conn. 412 (2011). |
Health benefits |
Cited- Unpublished opinion. |
|
Dep't of Health v. Rodriguez ex rel. Melendez, 5 So. 3d 22 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009). |
Health benefits |
Discussed |
|
Garcia v. Dicterow, No. G039824, 2008 WL 5050358 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 26, 2008). |
Day laborer site |
Discussed- Unpublished opinion. |
|
Cnty. of Alameda v. Agustin, No. A115092, 2007 WL 2759474 (Cal. Ct. App. Sept. 24, 2007). |
Child support |
Discussed- Unpublished opinion. |
|
Gamez v. Indus. Comm'n of Arizona, 213 Ariz. 314 (Ct. App. 2006). |
Health benefits |
Cited |
|
Karunakarum v. Town of Herndon, 70 Va. Cir. 208 (2006). |
Day laborer site |
Cited |
|
Szewczyk v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 275 Conn. 464 (2005). |
Health benefits |
Discussed |
|
City Plan Dev., Inc. v. Office of Labor Com'r, 121 Nev. 419 (2005). |
Payment of prevailing wage to undocumented persons. |
Discussed |
|
City of New York v. Stone, 11 A.D.3d 236 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004). |
Public assistance (SNAP benefits) |
Cited |
|
Rajeh v. Steel City Corp., 157 Ohio App. 3d 722 (2004). |
Worker’s compensation |
Discussed |
|
Avila v. Biedess, 206 Ariz. 311 (Ct. App. 2003) review denied and ordered depublished sub nom. Avila v. P Biedess/AHCCCS, 207 Ariz. 257 (2004). |
Health benefits |
Cited |
|
Cano v. Mallory Mgmt., 195 Misc. 2d 666 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2003). |
Claim for negligence |
Cited |
|
Aliessa ex rel. Fayad v. Novello, 96 N.Y.2d 418 (2001). |
Health benefits |
Discussed |
|
Doe v. Wilson, 57 Cal. App. 4th 296 (1997). |
Health benefits (prenatal care) |
Discussed |
8 U.S.C. § 1623
| Federal Cases Cited 8 U.S.C. 1623 | Case |
Type of Case/Benefit at Issue |
Depth of Discussion |
|
Ardash Marderosian Trust v. Quinn, No. 12 C 6869, 2013 WL 5405705 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 25, 2013). |
Resident tuition |
Cited |
|
Ruiz v. Robinson, 892 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (S.D. Fla. 2012). |
Resident tuition |
Cited |
|
D.G. ex rel. Stricklin v. Henry, 594 F. Supp. 2d 1273 (N.D. Okla. 2009). |
Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 |
Cited |
|
Day v. Bond, 511 F.3d 1030 (10th Cir. 2007)(denying request for rehearing). |
Resident tuition |
Discussed- decision turns on analysis. |
|
Day v. Bond, 500 F.3d 1127 (10th Cir. 2007). |
Resident tuition |
Discussed- decision turns on analysis. |
State Cases Citing 8 U.S.C. § 1623 |
** All state cases citing § 1623 also cite § 1621 ** |
|
Federal Cases Citing 8 U.S.C. § 1621 & 8 U.S.C. § 1623 |
Case |
Type of Case/Benefit at Issue |
Depth of Discussion |
|
Day v. Sebelius, 376 F. Supp. 2d 1022, 1026 (D. Kan. 2005) aff'd sub nom. Day v. Bond, 500 F.3d 1127 (10th Cir. 2007). |
Resident tuition |
Discussed- decision turns on analysis. |
|
Day v. Sebelius, 227 F.R.D. 668 (D. Kan. 2005). |
Resident tuition. |
Cited. |
|
Equal Access Educ. v. Merten, 305 F. Supp. 2d 585 (E.D. Va. 2004) |
Admission to post-secondary education. |
Discussed- decision turns on analysis. |
|
League of United Latin Am. Citizens v. Wilson, 997 F. Supp. 1244 (C.D. Cal. 1997). |
Post-secondary education and health benefits. |
Discussed- decision turns on analysis. |
State Cases Citing 8 U.S.C. § 1621 & 8 U.S.C. § 1623 |
Case |
Type of Case/Benefit at Issue |
Depth of Discussion |
|
In re Garcia, 58 Cal. 4th 440 (2014) |
Occupational license. |
Discussed- decision turns on analysis. |
|
Lone Star Coll. Sys. v. Immigration Reform Coal. of Texas (IRCOT), 418 S.W.3d 263 (Tex. App. 2013), review denied (Oct. 24, 2014). |
Financial aid. |
Discussed- decisions turns on analysis. |
|
A.Z. ex rel. B.Z. v. Higher Educ. Student Assistance Auth., 427 N.J. Super. 389 (App. Div. 2012). |
Financial aid. |
Cited |
|
Rocha v. Lien Vu, No. D055300, 2010 WL 4263772 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 29, 2010). |
Use of term “illegal alien” as prejudicial during trial. |
Cited- Unpublished opinion. |
|
Martinez v. The Regents of the Univ. of California, 50 Cal. 4th 1277 (2010) |
Resident tuition. |
Discussed- decision turns on analysis. |
|
Martinez v. Regents of Univ. of California, 166 Cal. App. 4th 1121, as modified on denial of reh'g (Oct. 7, 2008), review granted and opinion superseded, 198 P.3d 1 (Cal. 2008) and rev'd sub nom. Martinez v. The Regents of the Univ. of California, 50 Cal. 4th 1277 (2010) |
Resident tuition. |
Discussed. |
|
Martinez v. Regents of Univ. of California, No. CV 05-2064, 2006 WL 2974303 (Cal. Super. Ct. Oct. 4, 2006) rev'd,as modified on denial of reh'g (Oct. 7, 2008) 166 Cal. App. 4th 1121 (2008) review granted and opinion superseded, 198 P.3d 1 (Cal. 2008) and rev'd sub nom. Martinez v. The Regents of the Univ. of California, 50 Cal. 4th 1277 (2010). |
Resident tuition. |
Discussed- decision turns on analysis. |
Higher Education Immigration Benefits Cases Not Citing 8 U.S.C. § 1621 or 8 U.S.C. § 1623 |
Case |
Type of Case/Benefit at Issue |
Depth of Discussion |
|
Cortes v. Higher Educ. Student Assistance Auth., No. A-2142-11-T1 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2012) |
Financial aid. |
No cites to Sections 1621/1623 in Notice of Decision to Dismiss |
|
Mashiri v. Dep't of Educ., 724 F.3d 1028 (9th Cir. 2013) opinion amended and superseded on denial of reh’g en banc by Mashiri v. Dep't of Educ., 709 F.3d 1299 (9th Cir. 2013)
|
Financial aid. |
No cites to Sections1621/1623 |
|
Tobin v. Rea, 291 P.3d 983 (Ariz. 2013) (upholding challenge to Legislative Council's analysis of Prop. 204 [resident tuition bill] and ordering revisions to published analysis). |
Resident tuition. |
No cites to 1621/1623 |
|
DACA Beneficiary Georgia Coll. Students v. Univ. Sys. of Georgia’s Bd. of Regents, No. 14-cv-243077(Ga. Super. Ct. Fulton Cnty. Feb. 28, 2014), appeal filed, No. A14A2352 (Ga. Ct. App. Aug. 15, 2014). |
Resident tuition. |
No cites to 1621/1623 |
|
Doe v. Maryland State Bd. of Elections, No. O2-C11-163050 (Md. Cir. Ct. Feb. 17, 2012) (unsuccessful challenge to the state ballot measure “freezing” the 2011 Maryland Dream Act implementation), affirmed on appeal, Doe v. Maryland State Bd. of Elections, 53 A.3d 1111 (Md. 2012). |
Resident tuition. |
No cites to Sections1621/1623 |
|
Mannschreck v. Clare, No. Ci 10-8 (Neb. Dist. Ct. Dec. 17, 2010) (striking down challenge to Nebraska residency statute). |
Resident Tuition. |
No cites to Sections1621/1623 |
|
Herrera v. Finan, No. 7:14-cv-02255-BHH (D. S.C. filed June 10, 2014). |
Resident tuition |
No cites to Sections 1621/1623. |
|
Arizona v. Maricopa County Community College District Governing Board (“MCCCD”) v. Arizona, Arizona Super. Ct., County of Maricopa, No. CV2013-009093 (June 5, 2013) (MCCCD challenge by state on resident tuition policy for DACA students) |
Resident tuition |
No cites to Sections 1621/23. |
Non-Higher Education Immigration Benefits Cases Not Citing 8 U.S.C. § 1621 or 8 U.S.C. § 1623 |
|
|
|
|
Arizona Dream Act Coal. v. Brewer, 757 F.3d 1053 (9th Cir. 2014), aff’d on remand, No. CV12-02546 PHX, 2015 WL 300376 (D. Ariz. Jan. 22, 2015) (Arizona drivers’ license ban in Arizona; defendants permanently enjoined from enforcing any policy or practice by which the Arizona Department of Transportation refuses to accept Employment Authorization Documents, issued under DACA, as proof that the document holders are authorized under federal law to be present in the United States for purposes of obtaining a driver's license or state identification card). |
Driver’s licenses for DACA recipients. |
No cites to Sections 1621/1623. |
|
One Michigan v. Johnson, No. 2:12-cv-15551 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 19, 2012) (challenge to Michigan policy of denying driver's licenses to DACA recipients) (dismissed after Michigan reversed policy; No opinion due to voluntary dismissal. |
Driver’s licenses for DACA recipients. |
No cites to Sections 1621/1623. |
|
Hernandez v. Heineman, No. CI-13-2124 (Neb. Dist. Ct. June 10, 2013) (challenge to Nebraska policy of denying driver's licenses to DACA recipients), remanded to district court, No. 4:14-CV-3178, 2014 WL 7331928 (D. Neb. Dec. 19, 2014). |
Driver’s licenses for DACA recipients |
No cites to Sections 1621/1623. |
|
Juarez v. Nw. Mut. Life Ins. Co., No. 14-CV-5107 KBF, 2014 WL 6363919 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 14, 2014). |
EAD authorization for DACA recipient. |
No cites to Sections 1621/23. |