Chapter 9 - Acquisitive Corporate Reorganizations

Concept of a “corporate reorganization” - the exchange of an equity interest in the old corporation for shares in the new corporation.

Cf., §1001 re possible gain recognition.

Effects of tax-free corporate reorganizations:

1) Corporate parties to the transaction - no gain or loss on transfers of corporate owned properties.

2) Exchanging shareholders - no gain or loss.

3) Tax attributes are transferred to the acquirer.

Reorganization Alternatives              p.393

The “concept” of corporate reorganization for federal income tax (not bankruptcy) purposes:

1) Acquisitive reorganizations – one corporation

acquires the stock or assets of another corporation (i.e., the “target”).   Includes A (mergers), B (stock for stock) and C (stock for asset) deals, including various triangular transactions.

2) Divisive reorg. – splitting one entity

3) Nonacquisitive, nondivisive  reorg. – restructuring one corporation.

Judicial Limitations -  
Tax “Common Law”         p.394

1) “Business purpose” doctrine.

2) Continuity of interest (COI) (or ownership)

Requirement – possibly in definition of reorg. (e.g., B reorg – stock for voting stock)

3) Continuity of business enterprise (COBE)

requirement – applies to target’s business.

Note: a “step” or “integrated” transaction rule or

an “old and cold” rule also often applies.

Concepts of Tax-free Corporate Reorganizations

1) Limit is imposed on the character of the consideration received - a proprietary interest in the acquirer.  Must be stock in the acquirer (cf., nonqualified preferred).

2) Substantially all the transferor's properties must be acquired,  i.e., the operating “business” must be acquired.

3) A business purpose (i.e., non-tax objective) for the transaction must exist.

Tax Code Provisions re Tax-free Reorgs          p.395

§354 - no gain or loss is to be recognized upon an exchange of shares by shareholders who are parties to a reorganization.  Cf., §351.

§361 - no gain or loss to the acquired corporation.  Also, §1032 for the stock issuance by acquirer.

§§356/357 - treatment of boot received and liabilities assumed in the transaction.

§358/362(b) - substitute tax basis rules.

§381 - carryover of tax attributes.

How Assure Tax-free      P.396 Reorganization Treatment?

Options:

1) IRS Private Letter Ruling – but, limited

availability, unless a “significant issue” exists.

- See Rev. Proc. 2012-3 re ruling guidelines.

- See Rev. Proc. 77-37 (fn., p. 396) re guidelines for

issuing corporate reorganization tax private letter rulings.  Is this Rev. Proc. “substantive law”?

2) Law firm/accounting firm tax opinion letter.

Statutory Merger or Consolidation             p.396

Code §368(a)(1)(A).

1)  Merger:  Shareholders of the target

corporation receive shares of the acquiring corporation as a result of a “statutory merger” of target into purchaser, i.e., under local law merger statute (including foreign merger statutes).

2) Consolidation:  mergers of two existing

corporations into a third (often new) corporation.

Acquisitive Reorganizations         p.396

Non-tax considerations:

1) Shareholder approval is required (dependent upon state law requirements).

2) A dissenting shareholders’ proceeding is possible to protest the consideration paid in the transaction.

Divisive Mergers              p.397
(i.e., not “acquisitive”)

Rev. Rul. 2000-5 – for tax-free corporate

reorganization treatment the merger must be

acquisitive, rather than divisive (i.e., subject to the

§355 rules).

Mere compliance with the local corporate law

merger statute (i.e., calling the transaction a

“merger”) does not constitute a merger transaction

as a §368 tax-free corporate reorganization. 

Mergers involving Disregarded Entities  p.419

Examples of mergers between (1) a corporation

and (2) a disregarded entity:

1) Merger of a target corporation into a disregarded entity (e.g., LLC) is treated as a “merger” into another corporation.  Why?

2) Merger of an LLC into a corporation does not

qualify (since only divisional assets are

transferred, presumably not all of the assets of

the transferor corp., the owner of the LLC).

Continuity of Proprietary Interest – A Quantity Test

Southwest Natural Gas Co.                            p.399

Merger of Peoples Gas into Southwest.

Less than 1% of the consideration received was paid in acquirer’s common stock.  The remaining portion was paid in bonds or cash.

Held:  No “continuity of interest” results.

The stock received was not a substantial part of the value of  the property transferred.

Rev. Rul. 66-224              p.401
50% of Consideration as Stock

Four 25 percent shareholders - A & B received cash for their 25% interests;

C & D received stock for their 25% interests.

Held:  COI requirement was satisfied.

Alternative:  COI requirement is satisfied if each shareholder received 1/2 cash and 1/2 stock (total 50% in the form of stock as the consideration for the acquisition).

What Stock Percentage is Required?                       P. 402

1)  Nelson case (Sup. Ct – 1935) – 38% nonvoting

preferred stock was OK for COI rule.

2)  To obtain an IRS PLR – Rev. Proc. 77-37

requires a 50% stock value issuance.

3)  Reg. §1.368-1T(e)(2)(v), Example 1 (40% ok).

What is large firm practice (the “New York Rule”)

re a merger opinion?

What is “stock”?   Cf., “nonqualified preferred

stock” (as “boot”?).

Other Continuity of Interest Issues:                             p.403

1)  Remote continuity – can assets be dropped

down into subsidiaries by the Acquirer and not violate  COI test?  If to controlled (80%) subs.

2)  When to measure the COI test compliance (to

avoid possibly violating the COI threshold)?

- Day before the binding contract if a fixed number

of shares is to be delivered.

- Alternative if variable consideration, i.e., shares

are increased if Acquirer’s share value declines.

J.E. Seagram Corp. case           Reorg. Treatment            p.404

Competing tender offers for Conoco between Seagram and DuPont.  Neither gets 50%.

DuPont then acquires the remaining Conoco shares for DuPont stock (including the Seagram shares –  purchased previously for cash).

Seagram claims a loss - but IRS was successful in asserting that this was a reorganization (i.e., continuity of interest did exist).

Pre-deal trading not negating the tax-free status.

Continuity by Historic Target Shareholders

Kass v. Commissioner            p. 407, note 1

Squeeze-out upstream merger after a cash stock acquisition in a tender offer and a prior 80% plus purchase of Target’s stock.

5.82 percent of the outstanding stock was not tendered but then subjected to a squeeze-out. This enabled acquisition of the entire business.

Held:  Not a merger - even though the shareholder received exclusively shares of Acquirer.

Continuity of Interest (COI) Regulations

Reg. § 1.368-1(e)(1)(i).

Disposition of stock prior to a reorganization to unrelated persons will be disregarded and will not affect continuity of interest in the acquirer by the exchanging party.

Requirement:  Exchange Target stock for Purchaser stock & have at least 50 percent of the entire consideration being received as Purchaser’s equity.

Post-Acquisition Continuity
p. 409

How long must the target shareholders hold their stock in the acquiring corporation after their acquisition?

What is the impact of a pre-arranged stock sale commitment by majority shareholders?

The COI regulations focus on exchanges between target shareholders and the purchaser corp. 

Sales of stock by former target shareholders are generally disregarded (unless made to P or sub).

Rev. Rul. 99-58           p.410
Open Market Repurchase

Reorganization acquisition (50/50 stock & cash), followed by open market reacquisitions of  the Purchaser’s stock (redemptions? § 302(b)(2)).

The purpose of the reacquisition was to prevent stock ownership dilution for the Purchaser. 

No understanding that the P share ownership by the T shareholders would be transitory.   

No impact on the COI status resulted.

Disposition of stock to unrelated persons OK.

Continuity of Business Enterprise (COBE)      p.411

Bentsen v. Phinney    Corporation was engaged in land development business and transferred property to a life insurance company.

Shareholders received stock of insurance co.

Type of business carried on by the survivor entity (acquirer) was insurance business (not property).

No IRS private letter ruling re tax-free status.

Held: COBE requirement was satisfied - need not engage in the same business – only some business activity.  Appropriate result in this tax refund suit?

Rev. Rul. 81-25                p.414
Transferor Business Important

COBE requirement – per IRS:

Look to the business assets of the transferor corporation (not the transferee corporation) to determine whether the continuity of business enterprise (COBE) test is satisfied in the acquisition transaction.

Reg. § 1.368-1(d) (1980).

Must look to the transferor's historic business; no relevance to the business of the Acquirer. 

Continuity of Business Enterprise Regulations

COBE regulations - Reg.  §1.368-1(d).

COBE requires that the issuing corporation either continue the Target's historic business or use a significant portion of the Target's historic business assets.

COBE requirement is not violated if P transfers acquired T assets or stock to (1)  controlled subsidiaries,  or (2) a controlled partnership.

Reg.  §1.368-1(d)(4).

The “B” Reorganization -
Stock-for-stock Exchange  

Code §368(a)(1)(B).

Stock-for stock exchange (transaction is completed at the Target shareholder level):

Step 1.  A stock exchange occurs between the Target shareholders and the Purchaser Corporation (for P Shares).

Step 2.  The acquired Target Corporation becomes a subsidiary of the Purchaser as a result of the stock acquisition transaction.

Chapman case         p.416, fn.4
ITT/Hartford    “No boot in a B”

Motion for Summary Judgment:

ITT as the Purchaser of Hartford acquires 8% for cash and then an 80% exchange of “stock for stock” occurs.

Held:  Cannot exclude the prior acquisition for cash - if linkage exists. The 8% is not essentially irrelevant.  The entire payment in the acquisition transaction must not contain any non-stock.

On remand: are the two transactions linked?

What is “voting stock”
p.417

Stock must provide an unconditional right to vote on regular corporate decisions (not merely in supermajority situations).

Can be voting common stock of voting preferred stock. 

Warrants to purchase common voting stock do not themselves constitute voting stock.

Fractional Shares & Expenses                   p.417

No cash in the deal if acquiring corporation buys back the fractional shares.  What tax treatment to (redeeming) shareholder?  Dividend?

Payment target corporation expenses – of if acquirer pays, but not for expenses of target shareholders.

See Rev. Rul. 73-54,  p.417.

B Reorg. Eligibility & Dealing with Dissenters

Acquiring corporation pays cash to dissenters – violate “No boot in a B” requirement.

1)  Target can redeem dissenters prior to closing of acquisition deal (cash borrowed from Acquirer?).

2)  Redeem dissenters after acquisition deal is completed – but, will dissenters agree?  Cash for dissenters part of the original deal?

Contingent Payments in a B Reorg.?                   P.418

Issue:  Is stock only requirement violated?

Options for delayed payment:

1)  Commitment for contingent consideration, i.e.,

shares to be issued subsequently.

2)  Additional shares are escrowed – requires

payment of dividends and voting rights to shareholders who might receive from escrow.

“B” Reorganizations- Contingent Stock    p.419

Contingent stock arrangements are acceptable (for B reorg. eligible treatment) if:

1) Only additional stock can be issued.

2) Five year limit is applicable.

3) Valid business reason, e.g., a valuation issue.

4) Maximum 50% of the deal limit applies.

5) Contingent rights are not transferable.

6) No control by seller of triggering event.

The “C” Reorganization -The “Practical Merger”

Criteria for a valid "C" reorganization:  

1) Voting stock of the Acquirer is received by Target corporation.

2) “Substantially all” properties are transferred.

3) Liquidation of Target with the distribution to the shareholders of the Acquirer’s stock received.

4) Assumption of some liabilities is permitted.

5) Limited "boot" exception - but a 20% limitation rule (including  the liabilities assumed) applies.

The “Substantially All” Requirement               p.420

IRS ruling position:  70% of gross & 90% of net assets (for ruling purposes) are to be acquired.

Emphasis on the “operating assets” (even if the percentage tests are not met).

Cannot be a divisive transaction;  but, consider Rev. Rul. 88-48 (fn. 7) permitting the sale of 50% of the historic assets if the cash proceeds are also transferred by Target corporation to Purchaser.

Liquidation of the Target Corporation                     p.420

§368(a)(2)(G) requires the Target to distribute all

its assets (including the shares of the purchaser

corporation) in liquidation of Target.

Possible waiver of the liquidation requirement can

be obtained from the Service.  If so, treated as if (1)

the distribution to Target shareholders had

actually occurred, and (2) the assets were

thereafter contributed to the capital of a new

corporation.

Creeping Acquisitions          p.421

Prior purchase of stock of the Target - is this purchase transaction “old and cold”?

Purchaser’s prior holding of stock does not invalidate the “solely for voting stock” requirement.  See the prior Bausch &  Lomb history.

Under the “boot relation” rule the non-qualifying consideration cannot exceed 20% of the value of all of the Target’s properties.

Reg. § 1.368-2(d)(4)(i) & (ii).

Rev. Rul. 67-274              p.422
“C”, not a “B” Reorganization

1)  Y corporation acquired X corp. shares from X corporation shareholders in exchange for Y stock from Y corporation.

2)  Y corporation then liquidated X corporation into Y Corp. &  Y then conducted the X business.

Held:  A “step transaction” - not a "B" reorganization, but a "C" reorganization – i.e., a “stock for assets” exchange.

Why differentiate between the “B” and “C”?

Objectives of Triangular Reorganizations     p.423

To satisfy business (i.e., non-tax) objectives.

E.g., Parent avoids hidden liabilities in the transferred assets (through the isolation of the liabilities of the Target into a separate sub).

E.g., to facilitate the acquisition of non-transferable assets (through maintaining the Target corporation’s separate corporate existence).

E.g., to avoid shareholder votes (parent as sole shareholder votes stock of the acquisition sub).

Structures of Triangular Reorganizations        p.423

[See on website separate charts for structuring of these triangular reorganization transactions].

1)  Drop-downs of assets - §368(a)(2)(C).

2)  Use of subsidiaries –

- “parenthetical B”  - §368(a)(1)(B)

- “parenthetical C”  - §368(a)(1)(C)

3)   Forward triangular merger - §368(a)(2)(D)

4)   Reverse triangular merger - §368(a)(2)(E).

Forward Triangular Merger        p.424

Forward triangular merger - §368(a)(2)(D).

P creates Sub and contributes P stock to
Sub.   Then Target merges into Sub.

Requirements:

-  Sub acquires substantially all properties of T

    (note C reorg. equivalency)

-  No Sub stock is issued in the transaction

-  Would have qualified as an A reorg.

Reverse Triangular Merger p.425

Reverse triangular merger - §368(a)(2)(E).

Objective:  retain corporate status of the target.

P creates Sub and contributes P stock to Sub; then, Sub merges into the Target.

Requirements in the deal:  

1) Target remains holding assets of Target and Sub.

2)  Former Target shareholders receive P stock in exchange for their control of Target.

Multi-Step Transactions
p.426

Objectives in multi-step transactions:

1)  Achieve business plan – including regulatory and financial accounting issues

2)  Tax result based on overall transaction basis

3)  Relevance of Section 338/cash asset purchase transaction treatment.

Overall objective:  (1) get assets & control position acquired; (2) then, restructure to rationalize business operations.

Multi-Step Transactions
Rev. Rul. 2001-26       p.427

§368(a)(2)(E) reverse triangular merger issue:

Transaction: (1) tender offer of P stock for 51% of T’s stock,  followed by (2) merger of P’s sub into T and remaining T shareholders receive P voting stock and cash combination (83%+ consideration is stock).

(Alternative:  Sub initiates the tender offer).

Held:  When segments are integrated at least 80% of the T stock was acquired for P stock & tax-free reorg. status is available (under §368(a)(2)(E)).

Multi-Step Transactions
Rev. Rul. 2008-25       P.429

1) P forms merger sub which merges into T.

Consideration paid to T shareholder is 10x cash and 90X P voting stock.

2) T then liquidates into P (not a merger) & then P conducts the T business.

If separate: § 368(a)(2)(E) and then §332 .

If integrated: Not an (a)(2)(E) reorg since T does not hold substantially all properties. 

Holding: not a reorg & gain to shareholder; but not a stock purchase without a §338 election.

Problem 1(a)                    p.437
Stock & Notes Received

Qualifies as a “Type A” reorganization.

Nonvoting preferred stock ($300,000) and 5 year notes ($100,000) are received in merger of T into P.  75% of the consideration received by T shareholders is P stock and continuity of interest rule is satisfied? Yes, see Regs. - 40% test.

Nonrecognition to the shareholders - except to the extent that they receive "boot” (notes) - again assuming no nonqualified preferred stock.

Problem 1(b)               p.437
Stock & Notes Received

“Type A” reorganization.  Voting common stock ($400,000) received by four shareholders (total 40%) and cash ($400,000) received by six shareholders (total 60%) in merger.

Is the continuity of interest rule satisfied (& even if some receive only cash)?  Yes.  Rev. Rul. 66-224.

See Regs. re 40% test;  50% test - Rev. Proc. 77-37).

No gain recognition to shareholders receiving only stock.  §354.

Problem 1(c)               p.437
Stock Value Declines

Issue:  When to measure continuity of interest?

Valued on last business day before contract becomes binding, if contract provides for fixed consideration.

Here total value of deal declines from $4 million to $3,400,000.  Each of four shareholders lose 150x.

Stock is 1,000 of 3,400 or 29% of total consideration.

But, 40% stock consideration existed when deal became binding and the COI test is deemed satisfied.

Problem 1(d)               p.437
Stock Value Declines

T merges directly into P and each T shareholder receives $400,000 of P voting common stock. 

Under binding commitment six shareholders (with 60% of T stock) sell to 3rd party post merger. 

Rules now provide COI test is satisfied even if disposition per a pre-existing agreement.

Even OK if otherwise a COI problem since 40% stock retained here. 

Selling shareholders do have gain when selling.

Problem 1(e)               p.437
P sells T’s assets

P sells T’s assets to unrelated party and the proceeds are used to expand P’s business.

COBE issue:  Was T’s business continued?

Is being in same general  line of business (publishing) sufficient to establish the requisite COBE?   Probably not here.

Problem 1(f)                p.437
Exchange for Stock & Cash

P transfers to each T shareholder $360x of voting preferred stock and $40 cash for each T shareholder’s shares in T.

This is a stock-for-stock exchange requiring an analysis as to “B” reorg qualification.

But, no boot in a “B”;  therefore no tax-free reorganization treatment and full gain recognition to T shareholders.

Problem 1(g)               p.437
“B” Tax-free Exchange?

P purchases T shares from Dee Minimis for 400x and shortly thereafter holder exchanges P voting preferred stock (9 times 400x) for T shares.

“Step transaction” treatment and the first (cash) transaction disqualifies the rest of transaction from “B” reorg. treatment. 

No boot in a “B”.

Problem 1(h)               p.437
C Reorg - Asset Acquisition

P acquires T assets ($5 mil.) and assumes T liabilities (1 mil.) for $3.6 mil. P voting stock to T shareholders, plus $400x P 5 year notes.

“C” reorg treatment available?  Substantially all assets are acquired. But, consideration includes 400x boot and 1.0 mil debt assumption.

Thus, 72% (3.6x of 5.0x) consideration as stock and 28% (1.40x of 5.0x) consideration for cash & notes.

No “C” reorg.   Drop-down by P to S not raising remote contingency issue (but not a reorg).

Problem 1(i)               p.437
Asset Acquisition

Same as 1(h);  P acquires T assets ($4.6 mil.), but not 400x cash and assumes T liabilities (1 mil.) for $3.6 mil. P voting stock to T shareholders.

T distributes P shares and cash pro rata.

“C” reorg treatment is available. Liability assumption not treated as boot? And, §368(a)(2)(G) distribution requirement was satisfied.

Were “substantially all properties” transferred?

Transfer of 92% of gross (4.6/5.0) and 90% of net (43.6 of 4.0).  All operating assets were transferred.

Problem 1(j)                p.437
Reverse Triangular Merger

P’s sub Y-1 merges into T;  four T shareholders each receive $400x cash;  six T shareholders each receive $400x P nonvoting preferred stock.  T then merges upstream into P.

Multi-step acquisition & step-up transaction. 

First step – not a qualifying 368(a)(2)(E) (too much cash); but, but if integrated (with upstream merger)  then treated as an “A” reorg.?  Rev. Rul. 2001-46?

Problem 1(k)               p.437
Reverse Triangular Merger

P’s sub Y-1 merges into T;  four T shareholders each receive $400x cash;  six T shareholders each receive $400x P nonvoting preferred stock.  But, T then merges into Y-2, sub of P.

A (failed) §368(a)(2)(E) merger followed by a sidewise merger of T into a P subsidiary. 

If integrated (Rev. Rul. 2001-46?) , a §368(a)(2)(D)  forward triangular merger (COI test satisfied – 60%),  & “substantially all” properties test.

Problem 1(l)               p.438
Reverse Triangular Merger

P’s sub Y-1 merges into T;  four T shareholders each receive $400x cash;  six T shareholders each receive $400x P nonvoting preferred stock.  But, T then merges into Y-2, sub of P.

A (failed) §368(a)(2)(E) merger followed by a liquidation of T into P which is not a statutory merger (but §332 applies).

A failed “C” reorg (Rev. Rul. 2008-25) – since no voting stock issued.  Not a Type A since no merger.

All shareholders recognize gain on the stock sale.

Problem 1(m)              p.438
Reverse Triangular Merger

P’s sub Y-1 merges into T, but T is a wholly owned sub of S, Inc.  Not a reverse triangular merger, but an A reorg.  if integrated with an upstream merger of T into P.

Problem 2                  p.438
Creeping Acquisition Issue

10% stock purchase for cash five years ago is “old and cold.”  Purchase of 50% - question as to whether part of a step transaction. 

Type A – would qualify.

Type B – qualifies if 50% cash acquisition not related.

Type C -

Acquisitive Reorgs
Treatment of Parties  p.438    

Consider the income tax treatment resulting from a tax-free corporate reorganization for the following parties to that reorganization:

1) Shareholders of the Target corporation.

2) The Target corporation.

3)  The Acquiring corporation and any acquisition subsidiary.

Shareholder Consequences in a Reorganization    p.438    

§354(a)(1) - no gain or loss to be recognized on the share exchange (if solely for stock).

§358 - carryover/substituted stock basis.

§1223(1) - tacked holding period.

What if "boot” (cash or FMV of property)?

Often received in other than a B reorg.  §356(a).

Tax basis for any “boot” received – FMV.

continued

Shareholder Consequences “Boot”?                       p.438    

Receipt of “excess securities" (principal amount of securities received exceeds principal amount transferred away) -  excess treated as boot. 

Or, no prior securities and receiving securities – treated as receiving boot.

§356(a)(1) & §356(d).

If giving up securities and receiving stock (or lesser amount of securities) – no boot received in this transaction.

Tax Characterization of Boot Gain?                  p.439    

§356(a)(2). 

Recognized gain is treated as a dividend if the exchange “has the effect of the distribution of a dividend.” 

If such an effect, dividend treatment to the extent of the ratable share of E&P.

Characterization of Boot as Dividend or Capital Gain

A “boot dividend” is limited to the gain amount.

§356(a)(2) - (dividend within gain)

Tax rate of 15% on both dividend and capital gain

reduces tax significance, but:

1) Preferring dividends received deduction (DRD) –

for a corporate shareholder?

2) Boot gain received in form of installment notes?

–  no deferral if dividend characterization applies.

Commissioner v. Clark
p. 440 (n.12)   Code §356(a)(2)

Code §368(a)(2)(D) reorganization.

Received 300,000 P shares and $3.25 mil. cash.  Could have received 425,000 P shares.   

How determine Code §356(a)(2) applicability?

1)  A deemed pre-reorganization redemption of the Target acquired shares  (Shimberg case);  or,

2)  A deemed post-reorganization redemption of the acquiring corp. (P) shares  (Wright case)?

Tax Basis for Target Shareholders               p.442-3

§358 – basis in the stock received is derived from the

basis of the stock transferred.

What about multiple “tax lots” for shares received?

– tracing or pro rata allocation?  Allocation to each

block of stock is required.  Average basis method

not available – use tracing into separate blocks

Cf., FIFO rule, Reg. §1.1012-1(c); & basis reporting

by brokers – §6045(g) regs. (effective in 2011).

Target Corporation     p.444 Consequences & Issues

Income tax realization events occurring:

1) Reorganization exchange of its property for stock (and boot) (e.g., “A”, “C” or forward triangular reorganization).

2) Distribution in C reorg. corporate liquidation of the Purchaser’s stock received (or boot)  (or sale of that stock prior to corporate liquidation).

Any income tax recognition upon these events occurring?

Reorg. Exchange
Target Level Treatment

§361(a) - no gain or loss is recognized on the receipt  of assets in the reorganization transaction.

§357(a) - assumption of the target's liabilities is not treated as boot nor negate tax-free treatment.

These rules apply to (1) "A” &  “C” reorganizations, and (2) forward triangular mergers;  but, not for “B” reorganizations, or reverse triangular mergers, since stock, not assets, is acquired in these transactions (and corporation is not directly affected).

Shareholder Distributions Target’s Tax Effects   p.445

No gain or loss is recognized to Target when it distributes “qualified property.”  See §361(c).

"Qualified property" requirement is under §361(c) - stock of the other party in the reorganization.

If distribution of other than “qualified property” - e.g., boot;  then gain recognition on the distribution is required.  §§361(c)(1) & (2).

Target’s Tax Effects   p.445
Sales Before Liquidation

Sale of stock by Targeta as generating gain.

However, transfers of “qualified property” or boot directly to creditors (to pay debts) will qualify for non-recognition as the equivalent of distributions to shareholders. See §361(c).

If distribution of other than “qualified property” - e.g., boot;  then gain recognition on this distribution is required.  §§361(c)(1) & (2).

Acquiring Corporation Consequences - Asset Deal

§1032(a) - issuance of its shares in acquisitive reorg. by acquiring corporation is not a taxable event. 

Same result if issuance of debt securities by the acquirer occurs.  But, transferring other assets – gain to be recognized on transfer.

Tax basis for assets received by Acquirer:

§362(b) carryover from the transferor.

This is relevant in acquisition of target's assets:

“A” or “C” &  forward triangular merger.

Acquiring Corporation Consequences - Stock Deal

What tax basis result to a Acquirer when receiving stock from the “seller” shareholders in exchange for Acquirer stock?  In a "B" reorganization (or a reverse triangular) - take the shareholders’ tax bases for their stock exchanged.

Sampling is acceptable to determine the stock basis of the “selling” shareholders if Target has multiple shareholders.  Rev. Proc. 81-70, as amplified by Rev. Proc. 2011-35 re statistical analysis.

Acquiring Corporation -Triangular Reorganization

What if issuance by sub of parent's stock – does this constitute a transfer of appreciated property by the sub to the target shareholders?  No.

What tax basis to parent for the target stock received in a triangular reorganization (i.e., merger of (i) target into sub, or (ii) sub into target)?

Not basis of the stock of subsidiary (often zero). Rather - treat as (i) an asset acquisition, and (ii) an asset drop down transaction into the sub.

Buyer Transfers Property Rev. Rul. 72-327, p.447, fn2

1)  Recipient corporate shareholder receiving dividend boot can obtain dividends received deduction (under §243(a)).

2)  FMV basis for the asset received by shareholder as dividend boot.

3)  Acquiring corporation using appreciated property for acquisition recognizes gain on use of that appreciated property (40x less 10 x equals 30x gain).  Davis case.             continued

Rev. Rul. 72-327              p.47 continued

4) Acquirer’s E&P is increased by the gain

recognized.

5) Acquirer succeeds to the Target’s E&P.

6) Corporate shareholder receiving realized gain is

required to recognize that gain to extent of boot

and to include that boot amount in its E&P.

Problem 1(a)               p.449
Merger “A” Reorganization

Each shareholder receives (1) 4,000 shares ($40,000 FMV) of voting common stock and (2) nonvoting (not nonqualified) preferred stock worth $10,000.

1) Nontaxable - solely “stock for stock.”  §354(a).

2) Substituted basis. §358(a)(1) - $20,000 total basis;

common-16,000;  preferred - 4,000

3) Tacked holding period.   §1223(1).

4) Preferred stock & §306 stock. §306(c)(1)(B).  Even if received in a merger?  Yes.  But, §306(b)(4).

Problem 1(a), cont.     p.449
Merger “A” Reorganization

Target – no gain on the transfer of its assets in the merger.  T’s e&p (and other tax attributes) go to P.  §361(a) & §381(a).

A takes assets with (1) a $300,000 transferred basis and (2) a tacked holding period for those assets.  §362(b) & 1223(2).

Problem 1(b)               p.449 Note & Not Stock Received

Shareholder receives (1) 4,000 voting common stock plus (2) a 20 year $10,000 interest bearing note (rather than the preferred stock).

$10,000 gain to be recognized as boot; effect of a dividend?  Necessitates a Clark case analysis re §302(b)(2) redemption status eligibility.

Treatment as if (1) each shareholder received 5,000 shares and (2) subsequently transformed 1,000 shares into the $10,000 note.                                                      continued

Problem 1(b)        continued
Note & Stock Received

1)  Each shareholder before the deemed redemption: 

5,000 shares = $50,000 (1,000 shares are “boot”).

550,000 shares equals .909 shareholder %.

2)  After redemption:

4,000     (actual shares retained by each shareholder)

540,000  equals  .741 percent.

3) 80% times .909% equals .727% , and

§302(b)(2) test is not satisfied.  But, is §302(b)(1) (“not essentially equivalent” test) applicable?

Problem 1(c)               p.449
Notes to Two Shareholders

Two shareholders receive notes - $100,000. 

The remaining shareholders receive voting common stock worth $400,000.

1)  Shareholders receiving solely voting stock:

Non-recognition under §354(a)(1). Tacked holding.

$20,000 substituted basis under §358(a)(1).

2) Shareholders receiving solely securities. No §354.

Not boot, since no non-recognition property is                                                                                     received. Treated as §302 redemptions to each.

Problem 1(d)               p.450
Boot & T has limited E&P

T had $50,000 E&P, not $100,000 E&P.

Assume boot is received as a dividend. §356(a)(2).

What is the amount of  the §356(a)(2) dividend:

   1) only $50,000 of T's E&P?  or,

   2) also the E&P of the acquiring corporation?          

Cf.,  the §304(b)(2) result.   Assuming only T’s E&P is relevant: Each shareholder has $5,000 dividend and $5,000 gain from stock sale or exchange.

Note basis - $10,000;  stock basis - $20,000.

Problem 1(e)               p.450
“C” Reorganization 

P transfers voting stock worth $500,000 in exchange for T's assets (fmv $600,000; basis 300,000) subject to $100,000 liabilities; T distributes shares.

1) P - no gain when issuing P stock - §1032. P takes T’s E&P.  P - assets with $300,000 basis - §362(b).

2) T has no gain recognition for the $300,000 realized gain - §361(a). No gain recognition to T on the liquidation distribution of P stock - §361(c).  

3) T’s shareholders - nonrecognition & exchanged basis ($20,000) - §358(a)(1) & tacked holding period.

Problem 1(f)               p.450
Cash Used for Liabilities

P transfers $500,000 of voting stock and $100,000 cash to T; cash used to pay T debt.  C reorg & boot.

Stock is distributed in complete liquidation.

1) Target - recognizes no gain on transfer of its assets to P - §361(a) & (b)(1)(A).   “C” Reorg.

T received $100,000 boot which is distributed.

Distribution: No T gain on distribution of P stock - all is qualified property - §361(c)(1).

continued

Problem 1(f), continued
Cash Used for Liabilities

2) P - no recognition on cash & stock transfers. §1032.  P takes assets with transferred basis of $300,000. P succeeds to T’s E&P.

3) T shareholders:  eligibility for non-recognition –

§354(a).

Problem 1(g)               p.450
Securities as “boot.”

P transfers to T (a)  voting stock worth $500,000 and (b) investment securities (basis $40,000 and value $100,000 ) for all T's assets not subject to any liabilities. T sells securities and pays off liability, liquidates and distributes P stock to shareholders. 

1) T – no gain recognition on its asset transfers in exchange for stock & boot if T distributes boot. §361(b)(1)(A).   However, $100,000 gain recognized when securities sold. §361(b)(1)(B).  No gain recognition on A stock distribution.  §361(c)(1).

continued

Problem 1(g), continued
Securities as “boot.”

2)  A Corp – no gain on issuance of its stock - §1032.

A to recognize $60,000 gain on transfer of appreciated investment securities – which constitute boot.

A increased its e&p by $60,000 gain.

A takes T’s assets with $400,000 basis - $300,000 transferred basis and $100,000 gain recognized.

3)  Shareholders -  non-recognition & exchanged basis ($20,000) - §358(a)(1) & tacked holding period.

Problem 1(h)               p.450
Stock Sold for Debt

P transfers $600,000 stock for T’s assets and no assumption of T’s debt. T sells $100,000 of P’s stock and pays T’s debt.  T distributes remaining shares in liquidation distribution. 

1) T recognizes no gain on transfer of its operating assets.  §361.  If direct transfer of stock to creditors, no recognition.  §361(c)(3).  No immunity for a sale and, therefore, $50,000 gain to be recognized ($100,000 less $50,000 – 1/6^th of A shares basis.

No gain on distribution of remaining stock.

Problem 1(h), continued
Stock Sold for Debt

2)  A corporation – no gain on issuance of its stock. §1032.    $300,000 transferred basis in T’s assets and inherits T’s E&P account. 

No increase in basis of T’s assets because of $50,000 gain recognized by T.

3)  T shareholders - non-recognition & exchanged basis ($20,000) - §358(a)(1) & tacked holding period.

Problem 1(i)               p.450
T’s Stock Transfer

Transfer of stock by T to creditors of P stock as part of reorganization plan.
Code §361(c)(3) permits non-recognition of gain (i.e., $36,000 gain not recognized).

Stock transfer is treated as a distribution to the shareholders, entitling T to non-recognition under §361(c)(3).

E&P to be reduced by $50,000.

Problem 2(a)              p.450
Forward Triangular Merger

Code §368(a)(2)(D).

Formation of S - no gain to P (§361(a)).

P’s basis in its S stock - equal to T’s basis in assets - $100,000.   Reg. §1.358-6(c)(1).

S - no gain on its issuance of its own stock. §1032.

S has no gain on its transfer of (zero basis) P stock.

S takes T’s assets - $100,000 carryover basis.

T’s shareholders - no gain recognition for P stock.

Problem 2(b)              p.450
Reverse Triangular Merger

§368(a)(2)(E).   Parent - non-recognition on formation of S.   P’s subsequent basis in S stock - adjusted as if T had merged into S in a forward triangular merger. $100,000 for assets after reorg.

S - No gain on S issuing its own stock (§1032)  or when transferring (zero basis) P stock to T (§361).

T – nonrecognition (T stock for P stock).  §354.

Shareholders – nonrecognition when receiving P stock for T stock. §354(a)(1) & substituted basis.

Problem 2(c)              p.450
Forward Triangular Merger

Failed §368(a)(2)(D) – forward triangular.

Parent - non-recognition on §351 formation of S.

S - No gain on issuing its own stock. §1032.

$200,000 S gain when transferring P stock to T.

$100,000 T gain recognition on transfer of its assets.

S - §1012 cost basis for T’s assets.

T’s shareholders recognize 150,000 cap. gain and have 200,000 fmv basis for P stock held.

Problem 2(d)              p.450
Reverse Triangular Merger

Failed §368(a)(2)(E).

Parent - non-recognition on formation of S.

S - No gain on issuing its own stock.  §1032.

$200,000 S gain when transferring P stock to T.

T transfers T stock for P stock and no gain recognition - §1032.

T shareholders have 150,000 capital gain on T stock for P stock exchange.

Tax Policy Issues                
P.450

Should the tax rules for mergers & share acquisitions be elective for shareholders assuming cash is not received by the shareholders? 

Should corporations be permitted to elect taxable or tax basis carryover status, except where receiving boot type property (including cash)?

Should one uniform rule be adopted to prescribe continuity of interest rules?

Problem                  p.449