CONFLICTOF LAWS
SPRING SEMESTER
2012
PROF. WILLIAM P.
STRENG
INTRO TO CONFLICTS OF LAWS COURSE
A “conflict of laws” course concerns
the allocation of rights when the laws of multiple jurisdictions overlap in
applicability to a situation.
The question becomes: how to
choose the applicable law for the particular matter?
What is the scope of the applicable
law?
What are the priorities for courts
in choosing between the conflicting laws?
Possible Types of Conflicts between Laws
•
Two
states of the U.S.
•
State
and federal government
- substantive law (cf., 10th
Amendment)
- diversity jurisdiction
•
Two
nation states – transnational laws
•
Other
oppositional situations:
- conflict with Indian tribal law
- conflict with religious laws
Relevant Substantive Law Conflicts
•
Torts
•
Contracts
& business entities/laws
•
Property
– e.g., real estate, personal property, intellectual property
•
Family
law
•
Government
regulation, including U.S. constitutional issues.
•
Taxation
– federal and state
•
Transnational
& international law
Consider Cross-Border Conflict Situations
•
Personal
travel across jurisdictional borders
•
Commerce
across jurisdictional borders
•
Family
members in different jurisdictions.
•
Personal
assets owned in nonresident state
•
Business
assets located in other states
6) Internet transactions across borders
The Attorney & Client’s Objective
To achieve the strategic advantage for the
client
by choosing the most favorable legal system
for:
•
evaluating
one’s legal rights (e.g., for purposes of a transaction), and
•
contesting
the validity and enforceability of those rights in a litigation mode.
Important Relevance to Law Practice
Situations
•
Choosing
the applicable law for a business/investment, etc. planning transaction:
a) Substantive law governing the deal
b) Choice of law for any dispute
resolution
•
Litigation
strategy
a) Forum shopping
b) Choice of procedural law
c) Choice of governing substantive
law
Approaching the “Choice Process”
Alternatives:
•
Location
– the traditional approach – territorial or vested rights analysis.
•
Interest
analysis – 1st Restatement
•
Modern
approaches – 2nd Restatement
•
Constitutional
constraints:
- privileges and immunities clause
- due process clause
- full faith and credit clause
Problem 1 p.2
Male or Female?
Probate dispute (in Kansas) between:
1) decedent’s estranged son of decedent
and
2) decedent’s wife(?).
Challenge to the validity of the marriage:
1) W - Sex change operation in Wisconsin
& change in legal status documentation.
2) Kansas assets; residence in
Wisconsin?
3) Legal marriage in Wisc.; not in
Kansas.
continued
Problem 1, continued
Issues for resolution
Which state’s law determines the validity
of the marriage?
Should Kansas defer to Wisconsin?
How determine decedent’s residence at the
time of death? Assets in Kansas; much time spent in Wisconsin.
Relevance of the “Full Faith & Credit”
clause of the U.S. Constitution?
Superseding public policy concerns in
Kansas?
Problem 2 p.5
Long Arm of the Law
French court judgment against Yahoo –
violation of the French penal code.
Judgment enforcement action in Cal.
Where was the alleged action committed –
internet access in France? Could Yahoo block French based access? How
successfully?
Determined: Yahoo has an obligation to
block French based access to this web info.
continued
Problem 2 p.5
continued
Enforcement of a foreign penal sanction in
the local forum?
Should local court determine enforcement
based on local “public policy”?
Protection under the 1st
Amendment?
Consider the internet as being without
geographical borders –
Query: internet gambling site & U.S.
laws
Public policy re gambling? Use a foreign
sub?
Problem 3 p.9
Whose Artwork?
Louisiana resident files “quiet title” suit
re painting in Louisiana Fed. Dist. Ct. against Czech Republic resident.
Painting is in La.
Art originally taken by Nazis. Later sold
in Switzerland to NY gallery and then purchased by La. resident. Czech person
says he is heir to the confiscated painting & no good title later.
Swiss law: good title to stolen property
after five years – due diligence, but not for art.
New York: thief cannot pass good title –
holder must prove the negative, i.e., not stolen. Cont.
Problem 3 p.9
Whose Art? continued
Louisiana law – protection for property
owners – La. Civil Code & owner by prescription after a ten year holding
period.
U.S. law – Holocaust Victims Redress Act
- but no private cause of action (?)
International law principles – “moral responsibilities.”
A property law question – controlled by
which law? A diversity case requiring reference to local property law – but
which law? continued
Problem 3 p.9
Whose Art? continued
Use Louisiana “choice of law” rules in the diversity
proceeding in Fed. Dist. Ct.?
Which law should be applied to determine
the substantive property ownership question:
Is a private right of action & right of
ownership separately created under the federal law?
Should the local federal district court
create its own substantive law principles to deal with this situation?
WWWWW
wwww