Patent Law, Spring 2008, Course Coverage Table
Assignment | Start Page | Comment/Notes | Start OH# |
Date |
Call Group |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Introduction |
1-2 |
1.1 |
All |
||
Foundations - Bonito
Boats v. Thunder Craft |
3-10 |
||||
Origins - In re
Bergy |
10-11 |
||||
Patent History and Development |
11-18 |
||||
Forms of Patent Protection |
18-19 |
||||
Forms of Patent Protection (continued) |
24-26 |
||||
Nature and Function of the Patent System |
26-39 |
1.10.a |
|||
Example patent (US Pat. No. 5,190,351) |
20-23 |
Review this patent in detail; trace the claim
language to the specification's disclosure and to the components
shown in the drawings; what is the gist of the inventive concept? |
Thurs.,
Jan. 17 (last 30 minutes missing; battery failed) |
All |
|
Assignment | Start Page | Comment/Notes | Start OH# |
Date |
Call Group |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patent Eligibility |
57-60 |
2.1.a |
|||
Gottschalk v.
Benson |
60-67 |
stop before note 6, pg. 67 Example patent with method and structure claims: 4,079,239 |
Tues., Jan. 22 (no audio, battery failure) |
M |
|
Parker v. Flook |
67-68 |
2.10 |
|||
Diamond v. Diehr |
68-75 |
||||
Arrhythmia
Research v. Corazonix |
75-86 |
||||
In re Alappat |
86-88 |
M |
|||
State St. Bank
v. Signature |
88-95 |
US Pat. No. 5,193,056 |
2.20 |
||
AT&T v. Excel
|
95-98 |
stop before note 7, pg. 98 |
|||
"technological arts" - excerpt
of Ex parte Lundgren |
n/a |
Ex
parte Lundgren (full opinion, not assigned) |
|||
Compositions of Matter - Diamond
v. Chakrabarty |
100-109 |
skip note 2, pg. 108 |
R |
||
Method of Arbitration - In
re Comiskey |
1-8, 12-25 |
||||
Signals - In re
Nuijten |
1-2, 6-18 |
||||
131-132 |
think about these, they will be reviewed
in class |
||||
Assignment | Start Page | Comment/Notes | Start OH# |
Date |
Call Group |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Utility - Lowell
v. Lewis |
133-135 |
3.1.a |
R |
||
Juicy Whip v.
Orange Bang |
136-141 |
US Pat. No. 5,574,405 |
|||
Brenner v. Manson |
141-149 |
||||
In re Brana |
149-157 |
L |
|||
ESTs - In
re Fisher |
n/a |
n/a |
|||
Assignment | Start Page | Comment/Notes | Start OH# |
Date |
Call Group |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anticipation - Titanium
Metals Corp v. Banner |
159-170 |
skip note 4, pg. 170 |
4.1.a |
||
Inherency - Continental
Can v. Monsanto |
171-77 |
||||
Anticipation Exercise |
177-178 |
think about but do not externally research
the exercise; replace "DDS Catalog" in the last paragraph with "Fiendish Flouridators" |
L |
||
n/a |
|||||
n/a |
|||||
Statutory Bars - Public Use - Egbert
v. Lippmann |
179-187 |
4.10 |
R |
||
Metallizing Engr.
v Kenyon Bearing |
187-192 |
||||
City of Elizabeth
v. Pavement Co. |
192-199 |
||||
Lough v. Brunswick |
199-211 |
US Pat. No. 4,848,775 |
R |
||
On Sale Bar - Pfaff
v. Wells |
211-219 |
stop before note 6, pg. 219 US Pat. No. 4,491,377 |
4.20 |
||
n/a |
|||||
§102(a)/(b) - Patents - In
re Carlson |
230-235 |
M |
|||
§102(a)/(b) - Printed Publications
- In re Hall |
235-239 |
||||
§102(a)/(b) - "in this country"
- Ex parte Thomson |
239-243 |
||||
§102(c) - Abandonment |
243-244 |
||||
§102(d) - Delayed US Filing |
244-246 |
||||
246-247 |
think about but do not externally research
the exercises. |
M |
|||
Novelty - §102(a) - Prior Invention
- Woodcock v. Parker |
248-250 |
4.30 |
|||
Gillman v. Stern |
250-254 |
skip note 5, pg. 254 |
|||
Antedating a Reference |
254-255 |
||||
§102(g) |
255-260 |
||||
Conception - Oka
v. Youssefyeh |
260-264 |
skip note 3, pg. 263-64 |
|||
Reduction to Practice - Scott
v. Finney |
264-272 |
M |
|||
Diligence - Gould
v. Schawlow |
272-279 |
4.40 |
|||
Corroboration - Woodland
v. Flowertree |
280-287 |
L |
|||
Award to the Second Inventor - Apotex
v. Merck |
287-295 |
||||
§102(g) exercises |
n/a |
Overheads 4.43.a through 4.43.c |
|||
§102(e) - Disclosure in US Patents
- Alexander Milburn v. Bournonville |
295-300 |
skip note 5, pg. 299-300 |
|||
§102(f) - Derivation - Agawam
Woolen v. Jordan |
300-307 |
L |
|||
307 |
think about but do not externally research
the exercises; replace "1996" with "2001" in problem 3 |
||||
Assignment | Start Page | Comment/Notes | Start OH# |
Date |
Call Group |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Obviousness |
308-311 |
R |
|||
Notes 1 & 2 |
318-319 |
||||
Graham v. John Deere |
319-336 |
||||
Calmar v. Cook Chemical |
319-336 |
||||
Drawings for Graham and Cook Chemical |
343-344 |
||||
Notes on Obviousness |
344-347 |
stop before "In re Rouffet" |
|||
n/a |
|||||
Notes 1 to 3 |
355-358 |
R |
|||
Objective Tests - Hybritech
v. Monoclonal Antibodies |
358-371 |
stop before note 11, pg. 371 |
|||
Nonobviousness Exercise |
406-410 |
think about but do not externally research
the exercise |
M |
||
n/a |
read pages 2, 12-23 |
||||
n/a |
|||||
Prior Art for Nonobviousness |
411-412 |
stop before In re Stryker, pg. 412 |
|||
Analogous Art - In
re Clay |
428-434 |
skip note 4, pg. 433-434 |
M |
||
In re Winslow |
434-436 |
||||
n/a |
|||||
Assignment | Start Page | Comment/Notes | Start OH# |
Date |
Call Group |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Enablement - Gould
v. Hellwarth |
438-449 |
stop before note 8, pg. 449 |
|||
Atlas Powder v.
Dupont |
449-453 |
Annotated US Pat. No. 3,447,978 |
|||
In re Wright |
454-461 |
stop before note 5, pg. 461 |
L |
||
Wands Factors - note 4 |
461 |
||||
Written Description (new matter) - Vas-Cath
v. Mahurkar |
470-481 |
||||
Written Description Controversy - Univ.
of Rochester v. G.D. Searle and Co., Inc., 03-1304o (Fed. Cir. July
2, 2004) (order) |
n/a |
skip the table on pages 23-37 of the .pdf
file |
|||
Objective Disclosure Exercise |
496 |
think about but do not externally research
the exercise |
L |
||
Best Mode - Chemcast
v. Arco |
497-507 |
skip note 4, pgs. 505-506 |
|||
Assignment | Start Page | Comment/Notes | Start OH# |
Date |
Call Group |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Claims - Ex parte
Fressola |
525-533 |
||||
Format - Preamble - Catalina
Mktg. Int’l v. Coolsavings.com |
534-544 |
stop before §11.2[b], pg. 544 |
|||
Functional Claiming - In
re Donaldson |
555-565 |
R |
|||
Al-Site Corp. v.
VSI Int’l, Inc. |
565-578 |
||||
Jepson Claims - In
re Fout |
578-582 |
||||
Markush Claims |
582-583 |
||||
Definiteness - Orthokinetics
v. Safety Travel Chairs |
584-590 |
stop before note 4, pg. 590 |
M |
||
Assignment | Start Page | Comment/Notes | Start OH# |
Date |
Call Group |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Autogiro v. US |
744-749 |
||||
Literal - Markman
v. Westview Instruments |
749-760 |
||||
Preamble - Catalina
Mktg. Int’l v. Coolsavings.com |
534-544 |
This will not be covered again in class. |
|||
CCS Fitness v. Brunswick |
761-767 |
M |
|||
Interactive Gift
Exp. v. Compuserve |
767-776 |
||||
n/a |
|||||
DOE - Graver Tank
v. Linde Air Products |
777-782 |
L |
|||
Warner-Jenkinson
v. Hilton Davis |
782-798 |
||||
Pennwalt v. Durant-Wayland |
798-799 |
||||
Limitations on the DOE - All Elements
- Corning Glass v. Sumitomo |
799-807 |
L |
|||
PHE - Festo v. Shoketsu
. . . |
808-820 |
||||
Festo
on remand at the Federal Circuit |
n/a |
R |
|||
Dedication - Johnson
& Johnston v. R.E. Service |
820-833 |
||||
Prior Art - Wilson
v. David Goeffrey & Assoc. |
834-842 |
stop before §15.4, pg. 842 |
|||
Jazz Photo v. ITC |
864-875 |
stop before §15.7, pg. 875 |
R |
||
{end} |
Assignment | Start Page | Comment/Notes | Start OH# |
Date |
Call Group |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prosecution |
594-604 |
||||
Inventorship - Ethicon
v. US Surgical |
606-619 |
||||
Hess v. Advanced
Cardio. Sys |
619-627 |
||||
Inequitable Conduct - Duty of Disclosure |
627-629 |
||||
Intent - Kingsdown
v. Hollister |
629-639 |
||||
Materiality - Molins
v. Textron |
639-648 |
skip note 5, pg. 647 |
|||
Inequitable Conduct Case Summary: Purdue |
n/a |
||||
Inequitable Conduct Case Summary: Ferring |
n/a |
||||
Double Patenting - In
re Vogel |
648-655 |
||||
Post-Grant Procedures |
674-675 |
||||
Reissue - HP v.
Bausch & Lomb |
675-687 |
||||
ReExamination - In
re Recreative Tech. |
687-696 |
stop before §13.3, pg. 696 |
|||
697-698 |
|||||
Assignment | Start Page | Comment/Notes | Start OH# |
Date |
Call Group |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Laches and Estoppel - Aukerman
v. R.L. Chaides |
910-920 |
||||
Shop Rights - McElmurry
v. Ark. P&L |
920-926 |
||||
First Inventor Defense |
926-928 |
stop before "Additional Defenses Exercise",
pg. 928 |
|||
Remedies Overview |
930-931 |
stop before "H.H. Robertson . . ." |
|||
Permanent Injunctions |
940-941 |
||||
Damages - Panduit
v. Stahlin |
941-947 |
stop before "Rite-Hite . . ." |
|||
NOTE: this is the end of the assignments. | |||||
Assignment | Start Page | Comment/Notes | Start OH# |
Date |
Call Group |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
{ forthcoming } |
|||||
Last modified on April 17, 2008, by Greg R. Vetter