Greg R. Vetter
This course covers a study of licensing in the following types of licenses: patent, copyright, trademark, know-how, and digital information.
Please read carefully the Generally Applicable Syllabus Information. This document sets forth course policy for attendance, preparation and participation, use of computers, examination and grading, and other items. A complete understanding of this document is necessary to take full meaning from the Class Schedule and Other Information set forth immediately below.
Name: | Licensing & Technology Transfer |
Class # / Section #: | 5360 / 19491 |
Place: | 215 TUII |
Time: | Tuesday & Thursday, 9:00 a.m. to 10:15 a.m. (2 class sessions per week, 3 credit hours) |
Required Text: | Raymond T. Nimmer, Licensing of Intellectual Property and Other Information Assets (2d ed. 2007) (Lexis) |
Supplement?: | There is no requirement to purchase a statutory supplement. Certain documents may be assigned from time to time from sources other than the casebook. These documents will be provided via links in the class assignment table below or in a separate page of class links. Paper copies of these documents will typically not be provided in class, so students should plan to print them or review them electronically. |
Prerequisites | IP Survey, Patent Law, or Copyright Law |
Grading: | The course grade will be primarily based on an open-materials
final exam. "Primarily" means that at least 95% of the course grade will be based on the final exam. Probably 100% of the course grade will be based on the final exam, but I want to have given notice of the possibility of a small percentage of the grade coming from other sources, most likely one or more small exercises. Notwithstanding the above, my assessment of your in-class participation performance will not be a component of your grade. |
Brief Description of Coverage: | This class will meet in two 1.5 credit-hour blocks each week. Assignments will be detailed in the table below as the semester progresses. |
Absences Limit: | Assuming two class meetings a week, six or less absences
constitutes attendance meeting the eighty percent requirement. More
than six absences means that the eighty percent requirement is not met. Attendance will be taken via a roll sheet passed throughout the class each session. |
"Pick your seat" seating chart date: | Thursday, January 20, 2011 |
Final Exam Date/Time: | Tuesday, May 10, 2011; 9 a.m. - noon |
Final Exam Information: | click here for the Final Exam page |
First day/week's assignment: | Read this course web page, the linked Generally Applicable Syllabus Information, and the assignments detailed in the table below for the first day/week of class. |
{reserved} | {reserved} |
Audio Recording of Class Sessions | I will audio tape the class sessions using a portable recorder attached to my person and post links to the audio tracks on the class web site for the sole and limited educational purpose of allowing students to stream the recorded sessions to review or to enable students who missed a class to hear the class presentation. Any audio tracks created will be deleted and destroyed shortly after the final exam for the class. Since I call on students, there is a slight chance that your contributions to class discussion, whether voluntary or while on call, may be included in the audio recording. The chance is slight because the recording technology I use does a poor job of picking up any voices other than my own. Your continued registration in this class indicates your acquiescence to any such incidental recording for the purposes described above unless, if you have concerns about this, you come speak with me as soon as possible but in no event later than the first day of the second week of class. |
Cancellation Day(s) | Thursday, Jan. 27, 2011 |
Makeup(s) for Cancelled Day(s): | Friday, Mar. 4, 2011 (same time as regular meeting time) Friday, Apr. 1, 2011 (same time as regular meeting time) Friday, Apr. 29, 2011 (same time as regular meeting time) |
These are posted on my home page at:
The links below are for general reference and may be used for some class assignments.
The table linked below provides the detailed assignments for this course. It also may provide links to materials for each class and other items related to the course. In order to allow flexibility in the class, assignments beyond those posted for the next week are subject to change; therefore, students who may wish to read ahead are urged to contact the professor before doing so. The rate of progress through the modules depends on the class dynamics.
Class presentation slides are provided as links below in association with each module title. I will generally have the slides available a day or two before the material for that class. If students want hardcopy of the slides for use during class, please download and print the linked slides file.
After each class session, the class date will become a hyperlink to the audio for that class.
The casebook makes some use of "problems" - which in many cases are fact patterns adopted from actual cases. The problems' purpose is to illustrate twists in doctrine and provide additional context. When a problem is included in the assigned reading, there is no reason to write out an answer to the problem. Rather, it is sufficient to think about the problem and if desired make a few notes. Problems in the assigned reading may be the focus of class discussion, but will not always be touched upon in class.
Case names are listed in the table below as assignments. Sometimes there are several paragraphs of introduction before the case when the case is the lead case in a new subheading in the book. These introductory paragraphs are part of the assignment and should be read along with the case.
Revision to Generally Applicable Syllabus: Call assignment for cases is by individual using the first letter of the last name, proceeding alphabetically most of the time. In some instances, multiple persons share the same first letter of the last name, in which case a number indicates who the person is based on alphabetical order. If a person assigned to a case does not appear for a class session, I will look for volunteers. Adjustment of individual case assignments may occur up to mid-evening (around 7 pm) of the night before class.
Students must email me if they will not attend in order for this system to work well.
Assignment | Pages | Comment/Notes | Student |
Date |
{resv} |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Introduction |
1-7 |
||||
SpindelFabrik
v. Schubert & Salzar (Fed. Cir. 1987) |
8-13 |
J |
|||
in class discussion is to compare this model to the example given in the casebook |
B |
||||
Siedle v. NASD
(MD Florida 2003) |
13-17 |
another license example |
C1 |
||
What law applies - Federal Law - ProCD
v. Zeidenberg (7th 1996) |
17-24 |
C3 |
|||
Dailey v. Firetree,
Ltd. (M.D. Pa. 2006) |
n/a |
here is the link
to the Westlaw edition of the case; the cite is: 2006 WL 148879 |
D1 |
||
Lasercomb v. Reynolds
(4th 1990) |
24-32 |
D2 |
|||
What law applies within a State - Zapatha
v. Dairy Mart (Mass 1980) |
32-38 |
H2 |
|||
Gilmer v. Buena
Vista Home Video (WD Ark. 1996) |
38-40 |
H1 |
|||
Advant Sys v.
Unisys Corp (3rd 1991) |
40-46 |
L |
|||
Microsoft v. AT&T
(2007) |
47-55 |
M |
|||
Assignment | Pages | Comment/Notes | { resv } |
Date |
Call |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Introductory materials |
57-60 |
||||
Expansion Plus
v. Brown-Foreman Corp. (5th 1998) |
60-62 |
P |
|||
Celeritas Tech.
v. Rockwell (Fed. Cir. 1998) |
62-67 |
extra slides |
Q |
||
Idea Submissions - Nadel
v. Play-by-Play Toys (2d Cir. 1999) |
67-77 |
S1 |
|||
Wrench LLC v.
Taco Bell (6th Cir. 2001) |
77-87 |
S2 |
|||
Shrinkwrap - Mortenson
Co. v. Timberline Software (2d Cir. 1999) |
87-97 |
W |
|||
Online - Specht
v. Netscape (2d Cir. 2002) |
97-108 |
Y |
|||
Assignment | Pages | Comment/Notes | { resv } |
Date |
Call |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Formalities & Disclosures - Commonwealth
Film Processing v. Courtaulds US (WD Va. 1989) |
109-114 |
Z |
|||
Grappo v. Alitalia
(2d. 1995) |
115-119 |
B |
|||
Electronic Records & Signatures
- Parma Tile Mosaic & Marble v. Short
(NY 1996) |
119-123 |
C1 |
|||
Reforms, Disclosure & Attribution |
123-131 |
||||
FTC v. Verity
Intl. (SDNY 2000) |
132-139 |
||||
Assignment | Pages | Comment/Notes | { resv } |
Date |
Call |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rite-Hite v.
Kelley Co. (Fed. Cir. 1995) |
141-150 |
D1 |
|||
Obligation to exploit - Permanence
v. Kennametal (E.D. Mich. 1989) |
150-156 |
D2 |
|||
Mech. Ice Tray
v. GM (2d Cir. 1944) |
156-161 |
H2 |
|||
Standing to sue - Textile
Prod. v. Mead Corp. (Fed. Cir. 1998) |
161-165 |
||||
IP Prop. Dev.
Inc. v. TCI Cablevision (Fed. Cir. 2001) |
165-173 |
J |
|||
ICEE Dist. Inc.
v. J&J Snack Foods (5th Cir. 2003) |
173-176 |
L |
|||
Gruen Marketing
Corp. v. Benrus Watch Co. (ND Ill. 1997) |
176-181 |
M |
|||
n/a |
|||||
Kepner-Tregoe
v. Vroom (2d Cir. 1999) |
185-189 |
Q |
|||
Licensor obligations - Duncan
v. Royal Tops Mfg. (7th Cir. 1965) |
181-184 |
P |
|||
Assignment | Pages | Comment/Notes | { resv } |
Date |
Call |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interpretation |
193-195 |
||||
Grant - Defining Subject Matter
- Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp. (Fed. Cir.
1996) |
196-204 |
S1 |
|||
Apple v. Microsoft
(9th Cir.1994) |
204-209 |
S2 |
|||
Sun v. Microsoft
(9th Cir. 1999) |
209-219 |
W |
|||
Kennedy v.
NJDA (7th Cir. 1999) |
219-224 |
Y |
|||
Changing Tech. & Context - State
Contracting & Engr. v. Florida (Fed. Cir. 2001) |
224-226 |
Z |
|||
Boosey &
Hawkes v. Disney (2d Cir. 1999) |
226-234 |
C3 |
|||
Random House
v. Rosetta Books (SDNY 2002) |
234-243 |
H1 |
|||
Assignment | Pages | Comment/Notes | { resv } |
Date |
Call |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Everex Sys.
v. CadTrak (9th Cir. 1996) |
245-252 |
B |
|||
TAP Pubs.
v. Chinese Yellowpages (SDNY 1996) |
252-255 |
C1 |
|||
Non-Assignment Clauses - PPG
v. Guardian (6th Cir. 1979) |
255-262 |
C3 |
|||
First Nationwide Bank v. Florida Software
Svs (MD Fla 1991) |
262-267 |
D1 |
|||
Adobe v. One Stop Micro (ND Cal. 2000) |
274-279 |
H2 |
|||
First Sale & Exhaustion - DSC
Comms. v. Pulse Comms. (Fed. Cir. 1999) |
267-274 |
W |
|||
Patent Exhaustion - Mallinckrodt
v. Medipart (Fed. Cir. 1992) |
283-290 |
J |
|||
Intel v. ULSI (Fed. Cir. 1993) |
290-293 |
L |
|||
n/a |
M |
||||
Bona fide purchases / unauthorized
transfers - Rhone-Poulenc v. DeKalb Genetics
(Fed. Cir. 2002) |
293-299 |
P |
|||
Central Point Software v. Global Software
(EDNY 1995) |
279-283 |
H1 |
|||
Microsoft v. Harmony Computers (EDNY
1994) |
299-304 |
Q |
|||
Assignment | Pages | Comment/Notes | { resv } |
Date |
Call |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wang v. Mitsubishi (Fed. Cir. 1997) |
305-312 |
S1 |
|||
Foad Consulting v. Musil Govan Azzalino
(9th Cir. 2001) |
312-319 |
C1 |
|||
IAE v. Shaver (7th 1996) |
319-326 |
D2 |
|||
Hilgraeve Corp. v. Symantec Corp. (Fed.
Cir. 2001) |
326-330 |
Y |
|||
Jacobs v. Nintendo (Fed. Cir. 2004) |
330-334 |
Z |
|||
Met-Coil v. Korners (Fed. Cir. 1986) |
335-337 |
B |
|||
Anton/Bauer, Inc. v. PAG, Ltd. (Fed.
Cir. 2003) |
337-344 |
C3 |
|||
Jazz Photo v. ITC (Fed. Cir. 2001) |
344-349 |
D1 |
|||
McCoy v. Mitsuboshi Cutlery, Inc., (Fed.
Cir. 1995) |
349-353 |
S2 |
|||
Assignment | Pages | Comment/Notes | { resv } |
Date |
Call |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Validity - Loew's
v. Wolff (S.D. Cal. 1951) |
355-364 |
D2 |
|||
Non-Infringement - Chemtron
v. Aqua Prods (ED Va. 1993) |
364-367 |
H2 |
|||
Estoppel - Troxel
Manufacturing Co. v. Schwinn Bicycle Co.(6th 1972) |
367-376 |
H1 |
|||
Saturday Evening Post v. Rumbleseat Press
(7th Cir. 1987) |
376-380 |
J |
|||
Idaho Potato v. M&M Produce (2d Cir.
2003) |
380-385 |
Idaho Potato Commission Licensing
Page and Marks |
L |
||
Licensor Obligations - Value of Rights
- Westowne Shoes v. Brown (7th Cir.
1997) |
385-390 |
M |
|||
Quality of Performance - DPS
v. LH Smith Oil (Ind. App. 1986) |
390-395 |
P |
|||
Rosenstein v. Standard & Poor's (Ill.
App. 1993) |
395-401 |
{ this is not an assigned case } |
{ end of assignments } |
||
Chodos v. West Pub. (9th Cir. 2002) |
401-410 |
||||
3rd Party Product Liability - Torres
v. Goodyear (Arizona 1990) |
425-428 |
||||
Assignment | Pages | Comment/Notes | { resv } |
Date |
Call |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trademark QC - Barcamerica
v. Tyfield (9th Cir. 2002) |
429-437 |
||||
Exxon v. Oxxford Clothes (5th Cir. 1997)
|
437-442 |
||||
Disclosure / Competition - IDX Systems v. EPIC Systems (7th Cir. 2002) | 442-447 |
||||
Eden Hannon v. Sumitomo Trust (4th Cir.
1990) |
448-454 |
- |
|||
LicEE Developments - Liu
v. Price Waterhouse (7th Cir. 2002) |
454-459 |
||||
Assignment | {resv} | Comment/Notes | { resv } |
Date |
Call |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
{No Assignments} |
Assignment | {resv} | Comment/Notes | { resv } |
Date |
Call |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Royalty Base - Allen
Archery v. Precision Shooting (7th Cir. 1989) |
499-506 |
- |
|||
Zenith Radio v. Hazeltine Research (1969)
|
511-519 |
||||
Duration - Brulotte
v. Thys (1965) |
537-543 |
||||
Assigning Royalties - Broadcast
Music v. Hirsch (9th 1997) |
543-546 |
- |
|||
Assignment | {resv} | Comment/Notes | { resv } |
Date |
Call |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
{No Assignments} |
Assignment | {resv} | Comment/Notes | { resv } |
Date |
Call |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
{No Assignments} |
Last modified on April 14, 2011, by Greg R. Vetter