TV IN COURTROOM
Opinion No. 19 (1977)*
QUESTION: Does a trial judge violate Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 3A(7):
1. By permitting newsmen to film, photograph, record or broadcast all or any of
the trial proceedings from a vantage point inside the courtroom?
2. By permitting newsmen to film or photograph all or any part of trial
proceedings through the glass panels in the doors without actually entering the courtroom?
3. Is the answer the same if the parties, attorneys, and witnesses agree to the
filming, photographing, broadcasting or recording?
ANSWER: We answered each of the three questions in the affirmative for
the reasons now to be stated. Each of the questions is prefaced with
"permission" having been given by the judge for such conduct. The canon does not
speak to "permission"; rather, it speaks clearly but negatively; the judge
should prohibit all broadcasting except upon the occasions specified in the canon, none of
which are material here. The most recent authoritative expression of opinion in this area
of the law is that found in Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 49
L.Ed.2d 683, 96 S.Ct. 2791 (1976), and the opinion should be studied carefully before
taking any action which might be considered as a prior restraint upon the freedom of the
press.
On the other hand, the opinion in Bird v. State, 527 S.W.2d 891, 895-896 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1975), is directly in point and should govern judges in Texas conducting
criminal trials subject to review by that Court. This latter opinion is particularly
helpful since it is the only judicial construction of the particular canon under
consideration known to the Committee. The Committee on Judicial Ethics declines to answer
questions propounded seeking advice as to steps to be taken against a person who may
violate any rules regulating the conduct of spectators at a trial of a case. Such
questions relate to the duties and responsibilities of members of the judiciary and do not
come within the scope of the authority of this Committee.
_______________
*Provisions governing recording court proceedings were removed from the Code of Judicial
Conduct effective September 1, 1990. See Rule 18c, T.R.C.P.