Reporter's Notes for April Draft
REPORTER'S NOTES ON APRIL MEETING
FUTURE SCHEDULE
The attached materials represent a revision of the
prior draft reflecting both the debates of the Drafting
Committee and continuing consultation and input
from various groups and individuals concerned about
the Article 2B process.
The April meeting will
be the final Drafting Committee meeting before the
annual session of NCCUSL at which a first reading
of the draft will occur. The meeting agenda, which
is attached, reflects an effort to cover all of
the provisions of the draft that have not previously
been discussed in detail by the Committee and to
return to the basic scope issue that the Committee
has discussed, but should revisit before the annual
meeting.
In order to provide
a context for the discussion, the following pages
present not only a brief over-view of some of the
major changes in the draft since the March meeting,
but also a list of issues that should be resolved
by the Committee in April as a prelude for the annual
meeting and the activities of the committee during
the next year.
Highlights of Current Draft
The major changes in the April Draft include the
following
1. Contains
a definition of consequential damages, direct and
incidental in order to implement a Committee vote
that changed the default rule presumption to hold
that consequential damages are not available unless
agreed to by the parties. In order to protect parties,
contains a requirement that the party charged with
consequential loss must manifest assent to the particular
term.
2. Narrows
definition and focus of mass market licenses by
placing dollar cap on the cost of the license. The
term still covers both consumers and businesses
acquiring property in the general mass market.
3. Tightens
the focus and mandated elements for manifesting
assent to a term by requiring that the acts that
manifest assent be specifically keyed to the term,
rather than in the form of general conduct, such
as by shipping product or opening a package.
4. Deletes
treatment of consignments which will be covered
in Article 9 as to priority issues. Defines consignee
as a nonexclusive licensee for purposes of contract
issues under this Article.
5. Proposes
treatment of cases in which the basic choice of
law principle would select a foreign jurisdiction.
6. Deletes
section on cooperation based on opposition at the
meeting and on conclusion that relevant protections
are implicit in good faith standard.
7. Modifies
the treatment of attribution issues to include discussion
of "electronic agents."
8. Revises
virus obligations to clarify scope and to make the
obligation controllable by contract and context.
9. Returns
to use of the term "signed" as contrasted to authenticated,
leaving in provisions to create a signature other
than in traditional forms.
10. Expands
pre-existing provisions to focus on data disclosure
and use in reference to contractual arrangements.
11. Creates
section on distribution contracts to bring together
various provisions and issues relating to the distribution
chain.
|