Health Law & Policy Institute
OCCUPATIONAL
INJURY AND ILLNESS IN TEXAS EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
In 1991,
the Legislature of the State of Texas funded the study, "Occupational
Injury and Illness in Texas." The study was conducted by the University
of Houston Health Law & Policy Institute and involved collaboration
with the University of Houston Department of Economics, and The University
of Texas School of Public Health (the Southwest Center for Occupational
and Environmental Health). It also involved consultation with numerous
state and national occupational safety and health professionals, and a
sixty-two member advisory board.
The major
study objectives included:
(1) to
document the magnitude and economic costs of occupational injury and
illness in Texas;
(2) to
describe potentially hazardous occupational exposures in Texas;
(3) to
evaluate human resources in occupational safety and health in Texas;
and
(4) to
identify policy options for prevention of injury and illness and identify
areas needing further research.
Although recognized
as extremely important areas of occupational safety and health, the following
areas were beyond the scope of this study: environmental exposures and associated
health effects, enforcement issues, evaluation of workers' compensation
legislation or administration, and an exhaustive compilation or evaluation
of existing occupational health programs of public and private sector entities.
Magnitude
and Economic Costs of Occupational Injury and Illness
Occupational
injuries and illnesses exact a large human and economic toll from Texans.
The rate of occupational fatalities has fallen over the past decade in
Texas and the U.S., and available data for Texas do not indicate an excess
rate of nonfatal injuries and illnesses compared to the U.S. However,
Texas continues to experience an occupational traumatic fatality rate
sixty percent higher than the U.S. (private sector). Each year in Texas,
over 500 workers are killed and one-half million workers are injured on
the job. Although less precise estimates are available on illnesses, approximately
4,000 persons die from and over 20,000 workers develop an occupational
illness each year. Total economic losses related to medical costs and
lost productivity for these occupational injuries and illnesses amount
to $3.8 billion, of which over sixty-two percent are medical
costs. The tragic aspect of these data is that the majority of these injuries
and illnesses are preventable. Therefore, these adverse events
must not be considered an acceptable risk to our Texas work force.
Texas lacks
comprehensive, quality information needed to make sound policy decisions
in occupational safety and health. Accurate information can help policy
makers identify and prioritize problem areas so that resources can be
allocated in the most effective and efficient manner. Surveillance systems
for occupational injury, illness, hazard exposure, and medical costs for
Texas, as well as for the nation as a whole, are incomplete and fragmented,
and its availability to researchers is limited by confidentiality concerns.
Promising new federal/state efforts for injury surveillance are being
implemented, but these efforts have yet to be evaluated. Data collection
systems are more developed for fatal occupational injuries than for nonfatal
injuries; data on occupational illnesses are the most severely lacking.
Approximately
one million state, county, and municipal workers in Texas are not covered
under the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Adequate data are not available
on their injury and illness rates, despite the fact that many occupations
in the public sector are known to be at high risk for injuries and illnesses.
Based on
available data sources, the following highlights of the study should help
direct the identification of policy options:
STUDY
HIGHLIGHTS
I. Injury
and Illness
A. Leading
causes of fatal occupational injuries
- Motor-vehicle
and homicide deaths on the job account for forty percent of all work-related
injury deaths in Texas. Homicide became the leading cause of occupational
injury fatalities in 1991; however, the rate has always been high
and was overshadowed by a high rate of occupational motor vehicle-related
fatalities, which is declining.
B. Leading
types of nonfatal injuries and illnesses
- In
1989, over one-third of all workers' compensation compensable injuries
were back-related.
- Of
the illnesses reported to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, cumulative
trauma disorders accounted for fifty-five percent of all occupational
illnesses in Texas.
C. High-risk
workplaces
- Texas
rural counties experience occupational injury fatalities at a rate
eighty-two percent greater than urban counties.
- Construction
remains the industry division in Texas with the highest fatality rate
and the only industry not demonstrating declining rates since 1980.
Data were not available by firm size or other company characteristics.
- Meat
packing plant workers in Texas experience an extraordinarily high
injury rate (37.4 per 100 full-time workers per year), which exceeds
the already high U.S. rate by thirty-five percent.
D. Special
populations
- Based
on Texas death certificates from 1980-1990, each year on average,
eleven children were killed on the job in Texas. Further, in 1991,
over 1,000 injuries and illnesses among children less than 18 years
of age were reported to the Texas Workers' Compensation Commission.
- Several
special studies of occupational injury and illness in Texas indicated
a disproportionate representation of Hispanic workers.
II. Economic
Costs
- Economic
projections suggest that workers' compensation payments in 1990 would
have been over 41.2 percent below actual workers' compensation payments,
implying that the enormous growth in the program in the 1980s was
primarily due to factors other than changes in the work force size,
industrial structure, national trends in injury and illness incidence
rates, or wage rates.
III. Potentially
Hazardous Exposure
- An
estimated fourteen percent of Texas private sector workers are potentially
exposed to upper extremity cumulative trauma, six percent to crystalline
silica, and five percent to noise (shown to be related to cumulative
trauma disorders, silicosis, and noise-induced hearing loss, respectively).
- The
service industries of various types also had risks of potential exposures
in addition to traditionally hazardous industries.
- Direct
data for measuring agricultural worker exposure to pesticides within
Texas are not available.
- A large
percentage of the Texas work force is estimated to work in indoor
non-industrial environments in Texas at risk of health effects from
indoor air pollution. However, no information on the prevalence of
indoor air pollution is available in Texas.
- Even
after several years of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) hazard communication standard being in place, the largest category
for OSHA serious citations is hazard communication.
IV. Human
Resources
- In
Texas, there is a shortage of comprehensively trained core occupational
health professionals (physicians, nurses, industrial hygienists, and
safety professionals).
- More
than 150 additional occupational medicine physicians, 100 primary
care practitioners with occupational medicine training, and 1,600
occupational health nurses are needed to meet current occupational
health service demands in Texas. Although not quantifiable, there
is a shortage of professionals in nearly all areas of industrial hygiene
practice.
- Certain
geographic areas, such as the Rio Grande Valley, are particularly
affected by these shortages. This may be partially attributed to the
minimal number of programs in Texas providing specialized training
in occupational health.
- Fewer
than half of the nurses who work for business and industry in Texas
possess a baccalaureate degree. This degree is the minimum requirement
for 1995 applications for professional certification.
- There
is a lack of occupational health content in curricula in medical and
nursing schools, as well as in training programs for other occupational
health-related professional disciplines (occupational therapy, physical
therapy, vocational rehabilitation specialists, and chiropractors).
With prevention
as the single overriding focus for prioritization, this study developed
policy options to address the following three major areas which would improve
occupational safety and health in Texas: occupational safety and health
surveillance, programs, and professionals. The final chapter of this report
(Chapter 7) provides a more comprehensive list of policy options and associated
areas of needed research. Following are selected policy options for each
area which merit strongest consideration:
OCCUPATIONAL
SAFETY AND HEALTH SURVEILLANCE
(a) Designate
a lead agency to identify and coordinate the surveillance and prevention
efforts across the multiple state agencies that play a role in occupational
safety and health. Initiate surveillance and prevention efforts for
minors lawfully working.
(b) Clarify
and evaluate the role, purpose, and scope of Texas Workers' Compensation
Commission claim data collection efforts in relation to occupational
safety and health surveillance needs for the State.
(c) Systematically
collect and analyze data on public employees in Texas. Continue participation
of Texas in the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics Annual Survey of
private employees.
(d) Support
and expand Texas Department of Health's participation in the Sentinel
Event Notification System for Occupational Risks (SENSOR), a program
for identification and prevention of occupational diseases.
(e) Analyze
and evaluate Bureau of Labor Statistics survey data on detailed characteristics
of fatal and nonfatal injuries and illnesses using the newly redesigned
occupational safety and health coding system (ROSH).
(f) Reinstate
coding of usual occupation and industry on Texas death certificates.
(g) Evaluate
employer adherence to reporting fatal occupational injuries to the
Texas Workers' Compensation Commission. Increase inspections and safety
consultations for the workplace fatalities that OSHA does not investigate.
(h) Designate
a Texas agency to develop an index of relative exposure hazard among
types of industries (not specific companies) that can be periodically
updated.
(i) Increase
the involvement of the insurance industry in efforts to collection
occupational health and related medical cost data.
OCCUPATIONAL
SAFETY AND HEALTH PROGRAMS (a) Target
prevention and training programs based on leading causes of death (motor
vehicle and homicide), leading types of injuries and illnesses (back
injuries, cumulative trauma), high-risk workplaces (construction, meat
packing plants, agriculture), and special populations (minority, migrant,
child workers).
(b) Encourage
and support widespread employer institution of comprehensive occupational
safety and health programs.
(c) Encourage
the establishment of occupational safety and health programs that
meet OSHA's Voluntary Guidelines, which include four major elements:
(1) management commitment and employee involvement; (2) worksite analysis
of current or potential hazards; (3) hazard prevention and control;
and (4) safety and health training.
OCCUPATIONAL
SAFETY AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS (a) Provide
more opportunities for training of individuals to become occupational
safety and health professionals in Texas.
(b) Provide
a better distribution of professionals and services to the Rio Grande
Valley area of Texas.
(c) Increase
the quality and content of the occupational health curriculum in medical
and nursing schools and training programs in related occupational
safety and health professions. Increase awareness of the importance
of controlling safety and health in the workplace as a business operation
component by including relevant courses in business school curricula.
Evaluate the content and availability of continuing education courses
for these professionals.
PREFACE
Study
Objectives
The University
of Houston Health Law & Policy Institute was awarded a special line
item from the Texas legislature to direct and implement the study, "Occupational
Injury and Illness in Texas." This study was an interdepartmental and
interinstitutional collaboration between the University of Houston Health Law & Policy Institute, the University of Houston Department of Economics,
and The University of Texas School of Public Health at Houston (Southwest
Center for Occupational and Environmental Health). The major objectives
of the study were to document the magnitude and economic costs of occupational
injury and illness in Texas, to describe occupational exposures, to evaluate
human resources in occupational health and safety in Texas, to identify
policy options for prevention of injury and illness, and to make recommendations
for future study.
Organization
of the Report
Chapter 1
of the report presents a history of general occupational safety and health
activity in Texas, along with a brief history of surveillance of occupational
injuries and illnesses in Texas. Chapter 2 presents estimates of the burden
of occupational injury and illness for Texas. Chapter 3 describes the
magnitude of specific injury and illness conditions and specific worker
populations. Chapter 4 describes the population of workers in Texas, reviews
the potential hazardous occupational exposures in Texas, and estimates
the number of workers likely to be exposed to these hazards. Chapter 5
presents estimates of the economic consequences of occupational injuries
and illnesses. Chapter 6 documents Texas resources available for the prevention
and treatment of occupational injuries and illnesses. Chapter 7 discusses
policy options and recommends areas for research. |