Houston’s Immunization
Rates Lag Behind Other Cities
By Phyllis
Griffin Epps
Houston, home to a concentration
of medical knowledge and talent unparalleled in the world, ranks last among
the nation’s urban areas in rates of toddler immunizations. A report issued
in March 1999 showed that Houston bucks the national trend toward increasing
rates of immunization coverage. Only 61% of Houston’s young children are
adequately immunized, compared to rates of 92% and 79% in Boston and New
York, respectively. Houston’s current rates mark a decline from peak coverage
levels of 73% in 1994.
Houston-area practitioners,
administrators, and policymakers convened on February 10, 2000, to develop
strategies to increase immunization rates. The meeting, "Houston, We Have
A Problem: Our Children Are Under-Immunized," was sponsored by the Houston
Area Immunizations Coalition, Houston Department of Health and Human Services,
Episcopal Health Charities, and Merck Vaccine Division.
Attendees identified numerous
factors behind the poor immunization rates, including the following
-
Complexity of the vaccination
schedule. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends immunization
against 11 diseases at several different intervals over 16 years. Parents
have difficulty adhering to the schedule without help from the practitioner
or provider.
-
Absence of reliable and accessible
recordkeeping. Adherence to the recommended vaccination schedule requires
documentation or knowledge of the child’s history of vaccination. Correct,
timely immunization is thwarted by the rate at which families change residences,
jobs, and health care providers. The current system often results in incomplete
records, duplication of vaccinations and missed opportunities of receive
vaccinations.
-
Misinformation regarding
vaccine safety. A significant number of parents choose not to immunize
their children due to fears about the safety of the vaccination. Adverse
side effects do occur, but only rarely. The greater danger lies in failing
to control the resurgence of diseases through widespread immunization.
The following strategies for
improving rates have proved successful in other urban areas of comparable
size:
-
Statewide immunization registry
– An immunization registry is a database intended to centralize recordkeeping
and thereby increase vaccination coverage. A child’s history of vaccination
and other information are confidential but accessible via the Internet
by health care providers for the purpose of determining the proper administration
of vaccines. In some states, the registries have facilitated mailings to
parents to remind them when the next vaccination is due. ImmTrac http://www.tdh.state.tx.us/immunize/faq2list.htm
is the statewide childhood immunization-tracking system developed by the
Texas Department of Health and Electronic Data Systems (EDS). The Texas
Department of Health has also funded the Dr. Celine Hanson/Texas Children’s
Hospital Immunization Project to develop a childhood immunization registry
for Houston and Harris County. http://imreg.tch.tmc.edu/about.htm
The development of the local registry is the direct result of the state’s
determination of a need to address gaps in coverage for reasons unique
to the city and county. The local registry, scheduled to begin in May 2000,
will be linked to the state registry.
-
Partnerships between the
public and private sector – The private sector can play an important
role in educating the general public about the importance of proper immunization.
Large employers must accept a responsibility to emphasize immunization
as a priority among employees and to stress the importance of immunization
as a factor in negotiating contracts with health care providers. In one
city, the local utility company included leaflets intended to educate and
remind adults about immunizing the children in their lives. Detroit, ranked
lowest in the nation seven years ago but now enjoying a childhood immunization
coverage rate of 75%, benefited from coalitions on four levels: (1) senior-level
corporate representatives helped gather information about public attitudes
and other factors; (2) public and private health systems focused on education
initiatives; (3) in the hospital community, research coalitions funded
in part by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention helped track
and analyze the success of attempts to improve rates; and (4) vaccine manufactures
joined with public health officials and private health care providers to
create a "tool kit" for use by clinicians intended to simplify the actual
vaccination process.
The Department of Health and
Human Services listed other strategies now in place to improve rates: evening
and weekend clinics, clinics in non-traditional sites like supermarkets,
provider training, and measures to streamline the reporting of diseases.
03/07/00