[1]
under a Congressional mandate stipulated in the bipartisan Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996[2]
(HIPAA).The final rule became effective
on April 14, 2001 and most covered entities under the regulation must comply
by April 14, 2003.[3]On
July 6, 2001, DHHS issued its first set of guidance on the final rule.[4]
The
final rule applies the standards included in HIPAA to create specific federal
penalties for the improper use or disclosure of protected health information.Civil
penalties are up to $25,000 per person per year.Criminal
penalties are up to $250,000 and up to 10 years in prison.The
Secretary has delegated authority to enforce the privacy regulations to
the Office for Civil Rights at DHHS.
[2]
P.L. 104-191 (August 21, 1996)
[3]
For small health plans, the compliance date is April 14, 2004.
[6]
§160.204; the Secretary has delegated the authority of exception determinations
to the Office for Civil Rights
[10]
§164.502(d)(2); Covered entities may use and disclose PHI for purposes
of creating de-identified information, §164.502(d)(1); Requirements
for de-identification and re-identification can be found at §164.514(b)
and §164.514(c) respectively.
[12]
By holding covered entities responsible for the violations of their business
associates, these standards broaden protection of PHI beyond covered entities.
[13]
§164.502(e)(1)(i); Exceptions to this standard can be found in §164.502(e)(1)(ii)
[14]
§164.502(e)(2); Documentation can be by written contract or other
written agreement or arrangement with business associate. Specific requirements
can be found at §164.504(e)
[19]
§160.502(b)(1); Implementation specifications for the "minimum necessary"
standard can be found at §164.514(d)
[20]
§160.502(b)(2)(i); This provision makes sense. Access to health information
by providers should improve the quality of care. Other exceptions to the
"minimum necessary" standard are listed under §160.502(b)(2).
[21]
See unemancipated minors at §164.502(g)(3); and abuse, neglect, endangerment
situations at §164.502(g)(5)
[27]
§164.506(a)(2)(i); Health care providers who are in an indirect relationship
with the individual - not having direct or face-to-face contact with the
patient or acting under the orders of another provider (pharmacy, clinical
lab, pathology) - are not required to get consent, but are not prohibited
from doing so under §164.506(a)(4).
[33]
Use and disclosure for marketing and fundraising activities generally require
authorization. Authorization is not required in limited circumstances for
marketing, §164.514(e) and for fundraising , §164.514(f).
[45]
§164.510; Oral communication between the covered entity and the individual
is permissible.
[46]
§164.520(a)(1); exceptions for group health plans, §164.520(a)(2)
and for inmates, §164.520(a)(3)
[56]
§164.522(b); The covered entity must permit individuals to request
and accommodate reasonable requests by individuals to receive communications
of PHI by alternative means or at alternative locations.
[68]
§164.526(a)(2); Denial may be on the grounds that the PHI was not
created by the covered entity, §164.526(a)(2)(i); PHI is not part
of the designated record set, §164.526(a)(2)(ii); PHI not accessible
for inspection by individual, §164.526(a)(2)(iii); and PHI is accurate
and complete, §164.526(a)(2)(iv).
[77]
Disclosure to individuals of PHI,§164.528(a)(1)(ii); for the facility
directory or persons involved in individual's care, ,§164.528(a)(1)(iii);
for nation security, §164.528(a)(1)(iv); to correctional institution,
§164.528(a)(1)(v); and that occurred prior to the compliance date
for the covered entity, §164.528(a)(1)(vi).
[105]
On August 12, 1998, DHHS published its Security and Electronic Signature
Standards Notice of Proposed Rule Making. As of this writing, the final
security rule has not been published.