By Joseph
J. Wang
JWang@central.uh.edu
For the third consecutive year, the United States Congress has sought to pass comprehensive legislation banning genetic discrimination in employment and health insurance. On February 13, 2001, the Genetic Nondiscrimination in Health Insurance and Employment Act (S.318 & H.R.602) was introduced in the Senate by Senator Tom Daschle (D-SD) and in the House by Representative Louise Slaughter (D-NY).
The bill has two major provisions to prevent genetic discrimination in health insurance. First, the bill proposes to prohibit the use of genetic information in determining eligibility or in adjusting premium rates. Second, a health insurer "shall not request, require, collect, or purchase protected genetic information concerning an individual (or information about a request for or the receipt of genetic services by such individual or family member of such individual)." These restrictions would apply to both group and individual health insurance markets. See the full text available at http://thomas.loc.gov/.
For many Americans, a federal
law banning genetic discrimination in health insurance makes perfect sense.
Who wouldn’t want protection against this type of discrimination? This
legislation does have its critics, however. Prohibiting insurance companies
from using genetic information for underwriting purposes may ultimately
result in a much smaller individual health insurance market with much higher
prices through a process of adverse selection. The group health insurance
market could be affected as well. See Seth J. Chandler, The Genetic
Information Nondiscrimination in Health Insurance Act of 1999: Too Fast
and Too Federal? available at
Genetics/000803Nondiscrimination.html.
Currently, the only federal law that protects individuals from genetic discrimination in health insurance is the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). HIPAA does so in two major ways: (1) including genetic information as a factor that may not be used to deny or limit coverage in a group health insurance market; and (2) excluding genetic information from being considered as a preexisting condition.
Although HIPAA takes steps toward preventing genetic discrimination, the scope of the law is limited. HIPAA only provides greatest protection in the group health insurance market. HIPAA also provides protection for those moving from the group health insurance market to the individual market as well as for those who already have coverage in the individual market. However, a person seeking coverage in the individual health insurance market could be denied from or charged more for coverage based on his or her genetic information. Lack of federal protection for genetic discrimination in the individual health insurance market is a gaping gap.
State law in most jurisdictions
provides more protection against genetic discrimination than federal law
by further protecting those seeking coverage in the individual health insurance
market. The following table is a 50-state survey of state genetic nondiscrimination
laws in health insurance:
|
STATE |
STATUTE |
|
|
|
| Alabama | Ala. Code §§27-21A-7, 27-52-20, 27-53-1 et seq. |
|
|
|
| Alaska | Alaska Stat. §21.54.100 |
|
||
| Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§20-1379, 20-2310. |
|
|
|
| Arkansas | Ark.
Code Ann. §§23-79-119,
23-86-306 |
|
|
|
| California | Cal.
Health & Safety Code §1374.7;
Cal. Ins. Code §742.405 |
|
|
|
| Colorado | Colo.
Rev. Stat. Ann.
§§10-3-1104.7, 10-16-214 |
|
|
|
| Connecticut | Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. §38a-816 |
|
|
|
| Delaware | Del.
Code Ann. tit.18, §2317;
Del. Code Ann. Tit.18, §3607 |
|
|
|
| District of Columbia | D.C. Code Ann. §§31-3302.1 et seq., 31-3303.1 et seq. |
|
|
|
| Florida | Fla. Stat. Ann. §627.4301 |
|
|
|
| Georgia | Ga. Code Ann. §§33-54-1 et seq. |
|
|
|
| Hawaii | Haw. Rev. Stat. Ann. §431:10A-118 |
|
|
|
| Idaho | Idaho
Code §§41-4701 et seq.,
41-5201 et seq. |
|
|
|
| Illinois | 215
Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann.
513/10 et seq. |
|
|
|
| Indiana | Ind. Code Ann. §§27-8-26-1 et seq. |
|
|
|
| Iowa | Iowa Code Ann. §§513B.9A, 513C.8 |
|
|
|
| Kansas | Kan. Stat. Ann. §40-2259 |
|
|
|
| Kentucky | Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. §304.12-085 |
|
|
|
| Louisiana | La. Rev. Stat. Ann. §22:213.7 |
|
|
|
| Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 24-A, §2159-C |
|
|
|
| Maryland | Md. Code Ann., Ins. §27-909 |
|
|
|
| Massachusetts | Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch.175, §108H |
|
|
|
| Michigan | Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. §500.3407b |
|
|
|
| Minnesota | Minn. Stat. Ann. §72A.139 |
|
|
|
| Mississippi8 | ||||
| Missouri | Mo. Ann. Stat. §§375.1300 et seq. |
|
|
|
| Montana | Mon. Code Ann. §§33-18-901 et seq. |
|
|
|
| Nebraska | Neb. Rev. Stat. §§44-787, 44-6916 |
|
|
|
| Nevada | Nev. Rev. Stat. §689A.417 |
|
|
|
| New Hampshire | N.H.
Rev. Stat. Ann.
§§141-H:1 et seq. |
|
|
|
| New Jersey | N.J. Stat. Ann. §17B:30-12 |
|
|
|
| New Mexico | N.M. Stat. Ann. §§24-21-1 et seq. |
|
|
|
| New York | N.Y. Ins. Law §§3216, 4305 |
|
|
|
| North Carolina | N.C.
Gen. Stat. §§58-3-215,
58-68-35, 58-68-60 et seq. |
|
|
|
| North Dakota | N.D.
Cent. Code §§26.1-36.3-01 et
seq., 26.1-36.4-05 |
|
|
|
| Ohio | Ohio Rev. Code Ann. §3901.49 |
|
|
|
| Oklahoma | Okla. Stat. Ann. tit.36, §3614.1 |
|
|
|
| Oregon | Or. Rev. Stat. §§659.700, 746.135 |
|
|
|
| Pennsylvania | ||||
| Rhode Island | R.I. Gen. Laws §§27-18-52, 27-50-3 |
|
|
|
| South Carolina | S.C. Code Ann. §§38-93-10 et seq. |
|
|
|
| South Dakota | S.D. Codified Laws §58-17-82 |
|
|
|
| Tennessee | Tenn.
Code Ann. §§56-7-2701 et
seq., 56-7-2809, 56-7-2810 |
|
|
|
| Texas | Tex. Ins. Code Ann. art. 21.73 |
|
|
|
| Utah10 | ||||
| Vermont | Vt. Stat. Ann. tit.18, §§9331 et seq. |
|
|
|
| Virginia | Va.
Code Ann. §§38.2-508.4,
38.2-3430.1 et seq. |
|
|
|
| Washington12 | ||||
| West Virginia | W.Va. Code §33-15-2b |
|
|
|
| Wisconsin | Wis. Stat. Ann. §631.89 |
|
|
|
| Wyoming | Wyo.
Stat. Ann. §§14-2-109,
26-19-306 |
|
|
|
| 1
Prohibits genetic test to determine predisposition for cancer
2 Prohibits using, requiring, and/or requesting genetic tests and/or information 3 "Genetic information" expressly includes "family history" 4 Insurer may limit or discontinue coverage in the individual market, but must do so uniformly without regard to "health status-related factors" which include "genetic information" (A HIPAA provision for the individual market). 5 See Iowa Code Ann. §513C.8 where benefits for the standard health benefit plan for the individual market are substantially similar to those as provided under chapter 513B with respect to small group coverage. 6 "Genetic information" expressly excludes "family history" 7 Used in the context of expense-incurred hospital, medical, or surgical policies or certificate delivered, issued for delivery, or renewed in this state 8 See Miss. Code Ann. §83-63-11 prohibiting small employer health benefit plans from transferring or otherwise providing coverage to a nonrenewed class unless done without regard to case characteristics, claims experience, health status, or duration of coverage. 9 Prohibits requiring or requesting a genetic test 10 See Utah Code Ann. §31A-30-106 prohibiting individual and small employer health plans from transferring a covered insured into or out of a class of business unless done so without regard to case characteristics, claims experience, health status, or duration of coverage. 11 Prohibits conditioning insurance on the results of genetic testing of a member of the individual’s family 12 See Wash. Rev. Code Ann. §48.46.060 prohibiting canceling or failing to renew HMO enrollment for reasons relating solely to age, sex, race, or health status. 13 Effective September 1, 2001, "genetic information" means information that is obtained from or based on a scientific or medical determination of the presence or absence in an individual of a genetic characteristic; or derived from the results of a genetic test performed on that individual. This new definition of "genetic information could possibly include family history. 14 See Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 26-19-107 where "health status related factors" are defined in the group and blanket disability context as including "genetic information." 15 "Genetic information" defined in the context of paternity actions. |
||||
As of August 2001, forty-six states and the District of Columbia have enacted laws that protect individuals against genetic discrimination. Only Mississippi, Pennsylvania, Utah, and Washington have no general genetic nondiscrimination laws in health insurance.
In almost every state that has laws prohibiting genetic discrimination, the laws apply in both the group and individual health insurance markets. But in Alaska, Texas, and Wyoming, genetic anti-discrimination laws apply only in the group health insurance context leaving many individuals without protection.
Finally, the scope of protection is dependent on the definition of "genetic information" in the statutory language. If its definition is broader, the scope of protection is broader. In a majority of states, the definition of "genetic information" includes "family history." In a minority of states, the definition of "genetic information" either omits "family history" or expressly excludes it. Consequently, states that include "family history" as part of "genetic information" provide greater genetic nondiscrimination protection.
For more information on state laws and legislation regarding genetic information and health insurance, see the National Human Genome Research Institute website available at http://www.nhgri.nih.gov/Policy_and_public_affairs/Legislation/insure.htm.
08/31/01