Chapter 5
Capital Gains and Losses
Issues in this
Chapter:
1) Meshing
capital gains and losses
2 Capital
gains policy issues
3) The
“sale or exchange” requirement
4) The
“capital asset” definition
5) Depreciation
recapture
6) Code
§1231 property defined
7) Hedging
transactions
Mechanics of the Treatment
of Capital Gains & Losses
§1001(a) –
determine the amount of the gain realized;
How determine tax
basis (e.g., §1012)?
See
§6045(g) re brokers to report basis re securities transactions.
§1001(c) - gain
which is realized is to be “recognized” - unless otherwise provided in
the Code.
Tax Benefits and Planning
Objectives re Capital Gains
1. Beneficial rate
treatment - §1(h) provides for a 15% tax rate for long term capital
gains, subject to certain exceptions (e.g., collectibles @ 28% rate), through
2011 (& 20% rate after 2011?).
2. Capital losses
cannot be used to offset ordinary income (except for individuals to the extent
of $3,000 per year). How maximize the use of realized capital losses? Harvest
gains?
3. Definitional
consideration: what is a capital asset?
When Capital Gains
Exceed Capital Losses
Long term
capital gains - §1(h) - lower tax rates.
Code §1222(11) - the
excess of net long-term capital gain over net short-term capital loss is “net
capital gain”.
Meshing
of (i) long term capital gains and losses and (ii) short term capital gains and
losses is required to preclude arbitraging the tax rate structure.
Capital Losses
Exceed Capital Gains
1) Deductible losses are
available only to the extent of aggregate capital gains, but each year
individuals can deduct $3,000 excess capital losses against ordinary
income.
2) Code §1212(b) allows an
indefinite carryover of capital losses for individuals. Code
§1212(a) provides a five year capital loss carryover limit for corporations,
but a carryback is available for three years.
Problem - Applicability
of Capital Loss Rules
Year 1 –
Assume total losses of 9,000 exceed total gains of 8,000; deduction for 8,000
gains against 9,000 losses, plus 1,000 extra loss which can be used against
ordinary income.
Year 2 –
Assume total losses of 12,000 exceed total gains of 8,000; can deduct (i)
losses in an amount equal to gains, and (ii) lesser of the excess 4,000 or
3,000. Current deduction of 11,000 (8,000 & 3,000); 1,000 is
carried over.
Problem, continued
Year 3
–Assume total current losses of 14,000 plus 1,000 short term loss carryover
equals 15,000. And 15,000 exceeds assumed gains of 8,000.
Therefore, 8,000 (equal to
gain amount), plus 3,000 additional, can be used as losses.
4,000 (15,000 less 11,000)
is carried over and consists of long-term (?) capital loss. See Code §1212.
Planning considerations -
“Harvesting losses”
Sell gain and loss assets
in the same year?
No
(except for those individuals regularly having significant capital gains and
losses).
Alternative: stagger
gains and losses so as to (a) first use capital losses against $3,000 of
ordinary income, and (b) then have long term gains taxed at the preferable 15%
tax rate (or in reverse chronological order).
Capital Gains Tax Rate
Policy Issues p.544
1) Will lowering
the capital gains tax rate increase tax revenues by unlocking gains and
encourage gain recognition for income tax purposes?
2) Should relief be
available for possible income bunching effect (because multiple years’ value
accrual is taxed in one year)?
continued
Capital Gains Tax Rate
Policy Considerations
3) Relief of the
impact of inflation (but compare treatmentof assets held either for (i) one
year+ or (ii) 10 years)?
Is an option the indexation
of tax basis (impacted by holding period) to reflect inflation?
But, then also must
debt (1) owed by borrowers and (2) owned by lenders be indexed?
continued
Capital Gains Tax Rate
Policy Considerations, cont
4) Consider the “lock-in”
effect of the impact of capital gains tax rates & Code §1014 (basis
step-up at death). Avoid this by eliminating the realization concept?
Some Code provisions have “mark to market,” e.g., §475.
5) The
“realization” concept itself does enable (i) tax deferral (cf.,
Haig-Simons) & (ii) income tax benefits.
Capital Gains Tax Rate As
Enabling Tax Regressivity?
Who owns most
capital assets which produce capital gains? Probably the highest income
individuals?
Should capital
gain income be subject to the same tax rate as wage income?
Or, should risk-taking concerning capital be more rewarded through the income
tax system?
Does the lower rate
represent implementation of a quasi-consumption tax approach?
Why the limit on capital
loss utilization? p.549
Taxpayer cannot (1)
realize losses to offset against ordinary income, while (2) not
realizing economically accrued gains.
The limited $3,000
deduction for individuals does permit low level “cherry picking” for
loss utilization.
See §1211(b) re the
$3,000 capital loss allowance.
Differentiating: Capital
Asset or Wages? p.551
Note the discussion
concerning compensation paid to hedge fund & private equity fund managers:
i.e., the “2 & 20” formula.
The 2% of amount
invested does constitute ordinary income/compensation.
But,
what about the 20% participation in the upside gains? Particularly, when no
cash investment has been made by the managers.
Cf., tax
characterization of the growth of the capital value of a private company,
e.g., corporate shares/founders’ shares with value derived from “sweat equity.”
Defining the Term “Capital
Asset” - Code § 1221 p.551
Code §1221 provides a
definition of “capital asset” – but not including (for example):
1) inventory, and
2) property used in a
trade or business (i.e., Code §1231 property).
What is "property
held by the taxpayer primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of
his trade or business"? Inventory?
Impact of Code §1231
p.552
Code §1221(a)(2) provides
a definition of property identified in §1231 – depreciable or real property
used in a trade or business.
Sale of this property
produces capital gain or ordinary loss (after various netting procedures).
Further subject to
possible “depreciation recapture” – under Code § 1245.
Malat v.
Riddell p.552
Held “primarily for sale”?
§1221(a)(1)
provides for the exclusion from capital asset status of property held for sale.
Here: Taxpayer held
property for development or for sale (i.e. dual purpose property).
Was property held
“primarily for sale” to customers in ordinary course of trade?
The term
“primarily” means “of first importance” or “principally.”
Remanded for
further consideration.
Is this a “change
in purpose” case?
Cf., sales of
equipment by rental agencies.
Bramblett v. Commr.,
5th Cir. p.556
Parallel ownership
in a partnership and a corporation. Partnership sold investment land to corp.
for development by the corp. Sale for promissory notes from the corp.
Was the partnership
involved in selling the land?
Holding: Partnership
was not in the business of selling land & not an agent of the
corp.
See the seven
factors on p.558.
Appeals Court
rejects a “substance over form” analysis and the agency issues raised by IRS.
continued
Factors Impacting Dealer
Status – Fact Issues - p.561-4
1) Frequency and
substantiality of sales
2) Development
activities for the land (e.g., lots, streets, utilities and sewers)
3) Seller’s
activities/non-activities in sales
4) Relative
earnings – property sales income vs. earned income
5) Bulk sale or multiple
sales
6) Liquidation of
investments?
Cf., Code §1237 re
bifurcated treatment of the proceeds received by land developers.
Page 565.
Cf., Sellers of Stock and
Debt Securities p.564
Investors are entitled to
capital gains treatment (but gain may be short-term gain).
1) Dealers - sellers to
customers & ordinary income (or loss) treatment. See Code §1236 – enabling
dealers to earmark securities as investment assets (producing cap. gains/losses).
2) Traders – numerous
transactions – but not sales to “customers”; “day trader” treatment?
3) Investor – purchasing
for capital appreciation and longer term holding. Never a “business.”
Code §1231 –
p.565
Trade or Business Assets
Cf., Code §1221(a)(2)
capital gains exclusion & Section 1231 asset treatment (“quasi-capital”).
Aggregate Code §1231 gains
are treated as long term capital gain.
Compare: Aggregate Code
§1231 losses are treated as ordinary losses.
A five year meshing rule
applies to preclude staggering of these gains and losses to enable arbitraging
the tax rate differential - Code §1231(c).
Depreciation Recapture
§1245 - Personal Property
See p. 568.
1) An asset’s tax
basis is reduced (below FMV?) by tax depreciation (including §168, §179 &
§197). Code §1016(a)(2). By depreciation owner’s tax basis is recovered in
portions, not at only one time.
2) All disposition
gain equal to prior total tax depreciation deductions is ordinary income.
§1221 >
§1221(a)(2) > §1231 > §1245
This avoids tax
arbitraging (except for timing).
Depreciation Recapture
§1245
Sale of office equipment
held for two years:
original
cost basis 30,000
depreciation
claimed 8,000
sales
price 25,000
Amount realized of 25,000 less
22,000 adjusted tax basis (30-8=22); this 3,000 gain is recaptured under
§1245 as ordinary income (up to the amount of the prior tax depreciation).
Depreciation Recapture
Code Section 1250
Sale of rental real
property acquired three years ago:
cost 100,000 straight
line depreciation 9,000
sales
price 110,000
Code §1231 gain is
$19,000 (110,000 less 91,000 basis). SL depreciation & real property so no
§1250 recapture occurs.
If §1245 property - $9,000
recapture (not 19,000).
Inventor
Patents p.569
§1235 & Capital Gains
§1235 provides
capital gain treatment on the sale of a patent by an individual
inventor.
Capital gains
treatment is available even where the consideration received is based on
royalties.
All “substantial
rights” in the patent are to be transferred to enable capital gains treatment.
§§1221(a)(3) and
1231 exclusively apply to other types of patent transfers (e.g., not by
individual inventors).
Inventors tax treatment
extended to songwriters – see §1221(b)(3).
Corn Products case
p.572
Tax Common Law?
Were the purchases
and sales of the corn futures contracts “capital asset” transactions?
What is a “futures contract”? Protection on both sides?
Taxpayer says
futures trading was separate from its manufacturing operations. And,
therefore, capital gains (and losses) realized from the futures contracts were
capital.
Sup. Ct. says
futures contracts are equivalent to inventory and, therefore, ordinary
income (and loss) realized on disposition of futures contract.
Futures contract
losses as therefore ordinary?
“Corn Products” Doctrine
Arkansas Best case p.575
Was corporate stock
a capital asset or a §1231 asset? Taxpayer acquired stock in a Dallas bank. The
stock was sold at a loss after the bank became a problem bank (& ordinary
loss realized?).
Tax Court held the stock
purchases during the bank's “problem phase” were made exclusively for
business purposes. Reversed by 8th Cir. and Supreme Court affirmed.
Acquisition purpose is not deemed relevant. A “capital asset” was sold.
Sequels to Arkansas Best
No tax “common law”
definition of a capital asset exists – but this concept assumed after the Corn
Products case. But, a broad construction of §1221(a)(1) applies.
Regulatory response:
Reg. §1.1221-2 which limits non-capital asset treatment to hedging
transactions/“risk reduction” arrangements.
Consider the “source of
supply” stock ownership cases (not hedging cases).
Changes to IRC §1221
(1999)
p.581
Special exceptions
to the capital asset definition:
§1221(a)(6) –
commodities derivative financial instruments
§1221(a)(7) –
hedging transactions (timely identification is required)
§1221(a)(8) –
supplies of a type consumed by the taxpayer in the ordinary course of business
(e.g., airlines
purchase of fuel).
Rate Changes for Some
Assets p.585
Qualified small
business stock - §1202
- 50%
exclusion
-
special 75% exclusion through 2010
(even
more – 100%- for small business stock purchases in late 2010 and for 2011 -
§1202(a)(3))
Dividends – taxed
at the capital gains rate - §1(h)(11) (but what rate is applicable in 2012 -
39.6%?).
Common Law of Capital
Gains
p.585
Hort,
p.586 – lump sum payment received by owner upon the cancellation of a lease
treated as a substitute for future rent. Ordinary income.
P.G.
Lake, p.587 – corporation transferred a 600x “oil payment” to
its officer to pay a loan. Treatment of the assignment as a capital asset
transfer. Held: taxable to employer as ordinary income, since a
substitute for ordinary income.
Response is Code
§636 – treating the transaction as a loan. Seller is taxable on the income when
produced, subject to depletion deduction.
Bell’s
Estate p.592
Life interest & Remainder
Transfer by the
life tenant of a life interest to the remainderman – ordinary or capital
gain?
Held: Not a sale
of “naked rights” to receive income, but the sale of the life interest in the
property. The consideration received is to be characterized as capital gain.
What is the life
tenant’s tax basis? See §1001(e).
Cf., the Blair case
re assignment of income.
Commr. v. Ferrer p.595
The Meaning of “Property”
1) Surrender of
the lease of the play is not excluded from capital gains treatment.
2) Negative power
to prevent disposition or motion picture rights until after play production –
capital gain proceeds.
3) Right to
receive a portion of the motion picture proceeds – not a capital asset
disposition.
Sale of Body Parts
p.606
Property or Services?
Sale of rare
blood: Sale of property? If so, what is character of the income? Ordinary
income if regularly selling blood? See Green case.
Charitable
contribution of blood to a “blood bank” – contribution for fmv of blood (as
property) or a service (and no charitable deduction for value of services)?
See Code §170(e)(1)(A).
Other body parts?
What tax basis in a body part?
Lattera
p.606
Lottery winner
Taxpayer sold for a
lump sum the right to the remaining lottery winning payments (why
sell?), and reported sales proceeds as capital gains, and tax basis of zero
(except cost for lottery ticket?).
Annual payments are
treated as ordinary income, but different when a lump sum sale occurs?
Held: this payment
is a substitute for the regular receipt of ordinary income and,
therefore, is ordinary income. Equivalent to earned income?
Are
all capital assets essentially substitutes for a stream of ordinary income?
Williams v. McGowan
p.614 Sale of a Going Business
What tax character
for the sale of a going business (i.e., (1) one asset or (2) the various assets
of a sole proprietorship).
Prior partnership,
and loss on sale of the 2/3rd interest and gain on the 1/3rd
interest.
Sale of an entity
interest? Or (as suggested by Code §1221) is an allocation of the total price
to the various assets required, since some assets sold are capital and some
ordinary.
The allocation of
the sales price is to be based on the §1060 rules.
Allocation of Price - §1060
Asset Classes
Class 1 assets: Cash
& cash equivalents.
Class 2 assets: Marketable
securities.
Class 3 assets: Accounts
receivable.
Class 4 assets:
Inventory.
Class 5 assets:
Tangible property.
Class 6 assets:
Intangibles (§197).
Class 7 assets: Goodwill
& going concern value
(also §197 assets).
Cummings v. Commr.
P.616
Insider short swing
stock profits (within Securities 1933 Act, §16(b)), i.e., sold for gain and
then purchase same stock within six months for a lesser price. Gain (automatically)
required to be disgorged by the taxpayer to the employer.
Held: capital
loss treatment, not ordinary expense for the payment required.
Oher option: Treat
the payment of profits as an additional purchase cost for the new stock?
See Arrowsmith
case, U.S. Supreme Court (next slide).
Arrowsmith
p.621
Sup. Ct., 1952
Shareholder/taxpayer
liquidated a corporation.
Gain was reported
by sharehodler on the stock redemption (i.e., liquidation proceeds) as capital
gain.
Later the taxpayer
was required personally to pay a judgment against the corporation (i.e.,
transferee liability).
This subsequent
payment was treated as a capital loss, not as an ordinary and necessary
business expense, since a restoration of earlier cap. gain.
What is a Sale or
Exchange?
p.622 Postpone the Event?
Gain or loss arises
on the “sale or exchange of a capital asset.” See Code §1222.
How postpone this
sale/gain recognition event?
-
“Short sale against the box”: (1) owning securities, (2)
borrow similar securities, (3) sell the borrowed securities (short), thereby
terminating the risk on the investment; (4) then subsequently close the
transaction – delivering original shares.
But, Code §1259 –
gain on completing the original transaction. Constructive sale treatment.
What is a Sale or
Exchange?
Continued p.625
Alternative types
of gain realization postponement arrangements:
1) Buy a put option –
i.e., the right to sell security at a price equal to its present value;
2) Variable prepaid
forward contract – receiving up-front payment (up to 85% of fair market value)
in exchange for delivery of a variable amount of shares or cash in the future.
Are these gain realization
events? Should § 1259 reg. authority be exercised here? See p.626.
Abandonment or Terminating
Property Rights p.626
The abandonment
of property can constitute a “sale or exchange” (e.g., where nonrecourse
mortgage exceeds FMV of property; i.e., an “underwater” property).
Remember the Tufts
case (debt in excess of tax basis) with realization to extent of the debt
relief.
The termination of
a contract can constitute a sale or exchange – but not where merely
terminating a right to receive ordinary employment income.
Note Code §1241 re
capital gain treatment to the lessee for receiving a payment to
terminate a lease (p. 629).
Net
Gifts p.629
Diedrich v. Commissioner
Gift of property is
made subject to an obligation assumed by donee to pay gift tax arising from
the transfer. Is this a satisfaction of the taxpayer’s (gift tax) liability by
a 3rd party?
Does the donor have
(capital gain) income to the extent (1) gift tax amount (62x) exceeds (2) the
donor’s tax basis (51x) for the transferred property? A discharge of donor’s
legal gift tax obligation has occurred in a “deal.”
Note the
interrelated computation required here.
Cf., §1011(b) in
charitable bargain sale context.
Problem re
“Net Gift” Transaction
Gift transfer of
stock: Basis - 10x; fmv - 100x.
Condition that
donee pay 25x gift tax liability.
Gain
of 15x (25x tax less 10x basis)?
Is the donee’s tax
basis for the property 25x?
Reg. §1.1015-4.
Or,
is the sale made of 1/4 of the property?
(25/100;
approx tax basis of 2.5x – 1/4th of 10x) for the 25x portion deemed
received and, therefore, gain to donor of 22.5x (25x less 2.5x)?
Cf., the “bargain
sale to charity” rule. §1011(b).
Nonrecognition Rules p.636
Like-Kind Exchanges §1031
Under Code §1001(c)
gain is to be recognized – except as otherwise provided.
“Like-kind”
exchanges can enable gain recognition postponement - Code §1031.
No gain recognition
is required on a “like-kind” property exchange, except for the receipt
by the taxpayer of “boot” - §1001(b).
What is the
rationale for this provision enabling gain recognition postponement? A
valuation difficulty? lack of liquidity?
Basis shifted to
the replacement property. §1031(d).
Identifying “Like Kind”
Property p.640
Like-kind exchange
treatment permitted:
1) Different types
of real estate? Cf, TICs; sale-leasebacks (Marsh case – how long a lease?).
2) Auto trade-ins?
3) Professional
athlete contract swaps?
4) Partnership
interests swaps? No, but the separate assets of a partnership? Note:
Williams
v. McGowan case
See the limits in
§1031(a)(2). Liquid securities and inventory are not eligible. Coins?
Like-kind Exchange -
Deferred Property Receipt
“Starker” exchange – p.
638
Delayed receipt of the
exchange property – by relying on the creditworthiness of the exchanging
party. Does this qualify as a §1031 exchange?
See §1031(a)(3) specifying
45 day and 180 day limits for completing the exchange.
What if an interest charge
equivalent is credited to the replacement property purchase? Deferred?
How Assure “Exchange”
Status Exists?
§1031 does not
permit deferral upon the receipt of cash and then the reinvestment of
the cash proceeds in a new property.
How arrange a
tax-free exchange when one party is providing cash?
-
multi-party transactions (p. 637);
- §1031
exchange facilities
Cf., tenancy in
common (“TIC”) ownership arrangements.
How is the Gain Potential
Retained for Tax Purposes?
Tax basis for
the replacement property is:
1) same as the tax
basis for property transferred;
2) decreased by
the boot received;
3) increased by
the gain recognized on the exchange.
See §1031(d)
providing the rules for a transferred tax basis for the replacement property.
Like Kind Exchanges with
No “Boot” Received
Example 1:
Client owns Property A. Exchange of Property A worth 10x, basis 4x, for
like-kind Property B, also fmv 10x.
Taxable inclusion of gain
of 6x is postponed.
Tax basis for the
replacement property is 4x (to preserve the income tax potential on the 6x
deferred gain). Code §1031(d).
Like-kind Exchanges, cont.
Boot received
Example Two:
Transfer of Property A worth 10x (basis 4x, accrued gain is 6x) in exchange for
replacement Property B, fmv 8x, and additional 2x cash is received
(i.e., “boot”) by transferor.
Code §1031(b) - 6x
gain is realized. Gain is to be recognized to the extent of the
2x “boot.”
Tax basis for replacement
Property B (fmv 8x) is 4x (2x has been recognized; 4x is not recognized). Tax
basis for 2x cash received is (obviously) 2x.
Like-kind Exchanges, cont.
Boot Exceeds the Gain
Example Three:
Transfer of Property A worth 10x (basis 4x; 6x appreciation) for replacement
Property B, fmv 3x, plus cash (boot) received in the amount of 7x.
Code §1031(b) - 6x
gain (not the 7x cash amount) is to be recognized (i.e., recognition is only to
the extent of the gain actually realized).
Basis for Property B is 3x
(all the gain has been recognized). Basis for the cash is 7x.
Loss -
Like-kind Exchange Provision Is Not Elective
Example Four:
Transfer made of Property A worth 10x (basis 12x, i.e., loss property)
for replacement Property B, fmv 10x (i.e., same FMV).
No loss can be recognized.
Code §1031(a).
Basis for Property B
received is 12x (i.e., the 2x loss potential is retained in the replacement
property for future loss recognition when sold, unless subsequent appreciation
occurs).
Loss -
Like-kind Exchange Provision is Not Elective
Example Five (& boot received):
Transfer of Property A worth 10x (basis 12x, i.e., loss property) for (1)
replacement Property B, fmv 8x, and (2) 2x cash boot received by the “seller.”
No loss can be recognized.
Code §1031(c).
Tax basis for Property B
is 10x (the basis of the transferred property, as reduced by the 2x
cash); the 2x loss potential is retained in replacement property (8x fmv for
Property B with 10x basis); and, 2x tax basis applies for the cash received.
Like-kind Exchange -
Boot Received in Kind
Example Six:
Transfer of Property A worth 10x (tax basis is 4x, 6x appreciation) for (1)
replacement Property B, fmv 8x and (2) other property (e.g., listed stock)
worth 2x.
Code §1031(b) - 6x gain
is realized, but recognition applies only to extent of the “boot.”
Basis for Property B (fmv
8x) is 4x (2x of the 6x appreciation is recognized (& 4x gain potential)
& 2x is the tax basis for the boot (listed stock).
Like-kind Exchange -
Taxpayer Adds Cash Boot
Example Seven:
Transfer of both (1) Property A worth 10x (basis 4x, with 6x appreciation) and
(2) 5x cash for acquiring replacement Property B with a 15x fmv.
Code §1031(a) - 6x
gain is realized but no gain is to be recognized.
Basis for (15x fmv)
Property B is 9x (4x old basis plus the 5x new cash paid to the purchaser).
Involuntary Conversion Gains
& §1033 (Deferral) p.642
Postponement
of realized gain occurs if:
1) A gain is derived from
an involuntary conversion, e.g., theft, casualty, seizure, or eminent domain
(or a taking “threat”?); proceeds received from insurance?
2) An acquisition occurs
within the required time period (before the close of the 2nd taxable year of
gain) of a replacement property “similar or related in service or use.” Cf.,
the more expansive §1031“like kind” property concept.
Business Property Burned
Example
Building burned
down is business property. Receive 350x insurance proceeds; 200x basis for
the old property & 325x reinvestment in new property.
Under
§1033(a)(2)(A) the 150x of realized gain is included in GI only to extent of
25x (350x insurance proceeds less the lesser 325x reinvestment).
The 125x of
unrecognized gain reduces the tax basis for the replacement property to 200x.
The unrecognized
gain is preserved in the replacement property through this tax basis
adjustment.
§121 Personal Residence
Disposition p.644
Permanent exclusion
provision – for the gain on the sale of a personal residence:
$250,000
for a single return
$500,000
for a joint return.
No
reinvestment requirement (prior law: §1034).
How relate to the
involuntary conversion provision if the personal residence is destroyed and
insurance proceeds are received? Gross income exclusion or only postponement?
Code §121 – GI Exclusion
Problem
Sale of residence
for 350x in Year 4 of ownership; tax basis is 200x; realization of 150x gain
occurs.
Satisfy the 2 of 5
year principal residence requirement? 150x gain is excluded from GI under
§121. Buys new house for 400x.
No
downward basis adjustment for the new residence (because of the unrecognized
gain); the tax basis for the new residence is 400x.
What is the “tax
expenditure” cost for §121?
Example 2 - §121
& Involuntary Conversion
House is destroyed
by fire when the value of the principal residence is 300x. Reproduction cost
(enabling an insurance recovery) is 350x, paid in a subsequent year.
Reconstruction is completed in the next year for 325x amount.
Basis of old
residence is 200x, and the realized gain is 150x, but (assuming no limit) this
is excluded under §121 (even though an involuntary conversion has occurred).
The basis for the
new residence is 325x.
First Time Homebuyer’s
Refundable Tax Credit
2008 - $7,500
credit, subject to recapture over a 15 year period; 2009 – $8,000
credit.
“Worker,
Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009,” H.R.3548, 11-6-09
1) Extend the 1st
homebuyer credit to 5-1-10;
2) 2nd
time homebuyer’s credit - if in the current residence 5 of last 8 years -
$6,500 credit.
Purchase price
limit of $800,000.
Provision expired?